Get Our RSS Feed!
Front Porch Blog


Reflecting on Gainesville Loves Mountains


Thursday, May 10th, 2012
posted by brian



————————————————————————————————————————————–
We’re happy to share this guest blog post by Kathy Selvage. Last month, Kathy traveled to Florida to speak at Gainesville Loves Mountains. There she found engaged citizens with open hearts and minds.
————————————————————————————————————————————–

I landed at the airport in Jacksonville, FL., on Saturday afternoon, April 14, 2012 at the behest of Jason Fults who invited me to be part of the second Gainesville Loves Mountains series of events and activities. The image of two smokestacks near Jacksonville, seen from high above the earth, seemed to drive their image into my chest as we descended. It haunted me for quite awhile but quickly dissipated by the warm and wonderful people I met afterward.

Saturday night was devoted to getting to know my extraordinary hosts, Jason Fults and Laurel Nesbit, and I was thankful for that time to unwind slightly before we wound ourselves up again for what has proven to be a whirlwind of events.

The very next morning, I attended service with amazing people at UC Gainesville. It was a beautiful service, amazingly inclusive, a wonderful sermon by a seemingly “too young to be a minister” young man named Vince Amil. The repetitive words from a song stuck with me: “When the worship is over, service begins.” After crossing a very inviting courtyard, we met at 11:00 in a separate room for an Adult Education Class on Mountaintop Removal. How cool is that? I left them with a book for the church library accessible to all to remind others of the consequences of burning fossil fuels in this country, the consequence that is most often left out and ignored, the consequence of the extraction process on the Appalachian region and its people. I left there knowing in my heart that these intelligent, thoughtful people would engage and continue to be creative in ways not yet imaginable by me.

Circles close quickly when we are open to others and will have heartfelt conversations with them. I met a woman in the Church who was born in Wise, VA, where I have lived nearly all my life.

Read more
...


Snake Handlers, Strippers and the KKK: CNN’s Portrait of “Everyday Life in Appalachia”


Wednesday, May 9th, 2012
posted by Matt Wasson



So CNN ran a sensationalized and superficial story built on stereotypes that lacked any news value. Big news, right? Grow up, kid, this is the entertainment business…

That’s an excerpt from the conversation in my head before deciding to write a post about the photo-essay that was posted on the front page of CNN.com on Monday with the teaser image of a burning cross. The link was titled “Everyday Life in Appalachia.

Teaser Image for CNN's "Everyday Life in Appalachia"Photo Essay

I’ll spare you the righteous indignation and the pages of moralizing that virtually burst from my fingertips and get right to the point of why it’s worth calling attention to this particularly offensive piece of pseudo-journalistic garbage: misleading stereotypes have real world consequences.

In speaking with people all over the country for the last 10 years about the need to end the wholesale destruction of Appalachian mountains ,streams and communities from mountaintop removal coal mining, I often get the question: why are local people letting this happen? The answer, of course, is that they are not letting it happen. Weall Americans — are letting it happen.

We are allowing a unique and distinctly American culture and the oldest and most biologically diverse mountains and streams on the continent to be destroyed because it’s something we believe is happening somewhere else to somebody else. Of course it’s sad that these charming, albeit hopelessly degenerate cross burners, snake handlers and shirtless, barefoot hillbillies are being displaced by the march of progress, but it’s not like it’s something that is happening to people like me

Except that it is. The real Appalachia looks a lot more like the photos on your smartphone than the photos of snake handlers and burning crosses that CNN billed as “Everyday Life in Appalachia.”

What would happen if Americans realized that people just like them – accountants, engineers, welders, professors, miners, truckers, teachers, mothers, fathers, sons, daughters – are living with polluted drinking water, are three times as likely to have children born with birth defects and have a life expectancy comparable to that in developing countries like Iran, Syria, El Salvador and Vietnam? At Appalachian Voices, our theory has long been that bringing Americans to this realization is a crucial prerequisite for mustering the national will to end the destruction of Appalachian mountains and communities by mountaintop removal coal mining. For this reason, CNN’s prejudiced and exploitative treatment of Appalachian culture is not just offensive, but extremely damaging.

It’s hard for a small, under-resourced organization in Appalachia to compete with CNN’s megaphone, which is why we need your help. We set up a facebook page and a twitter hash tag #realappalachia for our friends and allies to show CNN and all Americans what the real Appalachia looks like. Here’s your assignment: post, tweet or e-mail a few of your favorite pictures of Appalachia and we’ll compile them here, on facebook and share them with the editors of CNN.com.

Grow Clean Water


Thursday, May 3rd, 2012
posted by jilliank



Jillian Kenny is a junior at Appalachian State University and an intern with Appalachian Voices’ Water Team. She does the dirty work of monitoring coal companies’ water pollution records, but her commitment to clean water extends beyond her intern hours.


I had the amazing opportunity to be on a team of students at Appalachian State University that has been working over the past school year to create a miniature wetland to install in the local salon Haircut 101. Bobbie Jo Swinson, the project’s student leader, received a $15,000 grant for the project last year from an EPA P3 Phase I grant. The purpose of EPA’s P3 — People, Prosperity, and the Planet — is to inspire students to design sustainable solutions for world issues and bring their ideas into the marketplace.

Our project, Grow Clean Water, was inspired by Bobbie Jo’s work as a hair stylist and her experience watching chemicals from hair treatments lost down the drain. Students from appropriate technology, biology, chemistry, interior design, and sustainable development worked to design the biological graywater system to treat the hair salon water using aquatic plants before being recycled through the salon’s toilets for flushing. Graywater is the water from sources such as baths, sinks, and laundry machines; it is not to be confused with blackwater, which contains fecal matter. Aside from removing contaminants, we also wanted the system to function as living art that would educate the community about recycling graywater.

Read more
...


Rebranding Bank of America’s Responsibility


Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012
posted by brian



————————————————————————————————————————————–
Join us in Charlotte on May 9 to remind Bank of America, the largest financier of the U.S. coal industry, of their responsibility to citizens and the environment. Visit our action page for more info and to sign up.
————————————————————————————————————————————–

BREAKING: Daring Action at Bank of America Stadium,” read the first email in my inbox this morning. Immediately, I thought what a crazed football fan might be capable of — in the offseason no less — if they were to break into the complex.

Turns out my imagination had taken the wrong course. The “daring action” at Bank of America Stadium targeted the bank itself. This morning, five activists from the Rainforest Action Network scaled the stadium walls before unfurling a banner suggesting a more appropriate name for the corporation. The “Bank of Coal” banner is a reminder to shareholders, board members and thousands on their daily commute, that the Charlotte-based bank cannot hide its long-standing relationship with coal industry under fluffy pronouncements of corporate responsibility.

Read more
...


Working Together for a Clean Energy Future in Virginia


Monday, April 30th, 2012
posted by Tom



I’ve been thinking a lot about the future lately. Our family has a set of newborn twins expected home from the hospital within another week or two, and it’s funny how babies simultaneously awaken you to the present moment and highlight the importance of preparing well for the coming decades and beyond. Kids transform the future from something abstract to something so literally tangible that you regularly hold it in your arms.

There’s the personal side of this, of course – everything from financial planning to the apple and pear trees my four-year-old and I planted in the backyard earlier this year and the new garden beds we’re building. But there’s no escaping the fact that, prepare individually as we might, the fates of our families and offspring – and everything else we care about – are tied to the future of our communities, our society, and the planet itself. To be sure, contemplating this reality can lead to despair for those attuned to the array of threats to our common future. But despair get us nowhere, and there’s something far more useful that comes just as naturally: the excitement of working together to lay the foundation for a bright future in the face of these threats.

Opportunities to do this abound, and a central part of Appalachian Voices’ role is to engage people willing and able to take at least a little time for this exciting work.

There’s an important opportunity right now, actually. Virginia is currently reviewing Dominion Virginia Power’s 15-year plan for providing the electricity we use. In other words, this is the time for Virginians to make our voices heard regarding how Dominion will be investing the money from our electric bills when my twins are teenagers. Will they still be pouring our cash into dirty energy sources like coal that wreck havoc on our mountains, air, water and climate? Well, according to Dominion’s 15-year plan, they will be. Although the plan does call for retiring some of Dominion’s oldest coal-fired power plants (a good first step), it also involves no large-scale wind or solar projects and falls far short of Virginia’s conservative goal for increased energy efficiency! In other words, Dominion plans to continue locking us into dependence on the fossil fuels that are one of the greatest threats to our children’s future.

Fortunately, the State Corporation Commission (SCC) is accepting comments from Virginians on the plan. And we’ve made it easy for you to submit a comment on the Wise Energy for Virginia website demanding that electricity ratepayers’ money be invested in a transition to clean energy. And, for those of you able to go the extra mile to voice your desire for a clean energy future, please consider attending our coalition’s Rally for a Clean Energy Future in Richmond scheduled to take place outside the SCC building next Tuesday, May 8, the day the SCC begins its hearing on Dominion’s plan.

Can you imagine watching a clean energy future for Virginia growing over the years along with the children, trees and gardens in our communities? We can – and must – work together to make this a reality. Please take the time to submit a comment, and I hope many of you can make it to Richmond next Tuesday, May 8!

KY Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Citizens and Water


Friday, April 27th, 2012
posted by eric



Yesterday the Kentucky State Supreme Court ruled in favor of Appalachian Voices and our partners KFTC, Waterkeeper and the Kentucky Riverkeeper. The ruling upheld lower court rulings allowing us to intervene in a lawsuit between Frasure Creek Mining and the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet.

That case was brought about in October 2010 when we filed a Notice of Intent to Sue against Frasure Creek Mining, and International Coal Group (Now an Arch Coal subsidiary) for 20,000 violations of the Clean Water Act with potential penalties of over $700 million. The bulk of these violations relate to false and potentially fraudulent reporting of water pollution levels. Under the Clean Water Act companies have limits on the amount of pollution they are allowed to release, and they are required to monitor their pollution to make sure they meet these limits.

In an effort to keep us from being able to bring a case in federal court, the coal companies reached settlements with the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet, but those settlements needed to be approved by a state court. The settlements amounted to little more than a slap on the wrist; they have minimal fines and no meaningful measures to ensure that the same problems will not continue. Through the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act, citizen are allowed to participate in legal actions to protect public waters. Using this provision, we intervened in the state court case in order to argue that the state’s settlement was not fair, adequate and in the public interest.

Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision upheld the lower court’s decision to allow us to intervene in that case, and provides clarification for citizens wishing to intervene in future Clean Water Act enforcement cases in Kentucky.

In September of 2011 a three day trial, for the case in which we intervened, was held to determine whether or not the settlement should be entered. The court has yet to rule on that matter, and ordered all the parties to mediation. Settlement talks are still ongoing.

The Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet’s role in this case has been an interesting one. They opposed our intervention (contrary to federal law), and they joined Frasure Creek in appealing the decision to allow us to intervene. It seems odd that an agency whose duty is to protect citizens from pollution has been spending its limited resources trying to prevent citizens from intervening to protect streams they use and enjoy. Yesterday’s Ruling even stated, “an interested citizen’s not being permitted to so intervene can be a factor casting doubt upon the ‘diligence’ of the state’s enforcement efforts.”

We hope that this case will be a step towards cooperation between the Cabinet, Kentucky coal companies and citizens, so Kentucky can have coal jobs and clean, safe water.

-Click here to see the KY Supreme Court Ruling

-Click here to find out more about the history of this case

Protect Families: Stop Toxic Coal Ash From Polluting the Federal Transportation Bill


Tuesday, April 24th, 2012
posted by sandra



Keep Coal Ash Out of our Water and the Transportation Bill!

West Virginia Rep. David McKinley is a man on a mission — to save the coal industry from the bullies at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. McKinley’s afraid that the EPA may eventually require coal-fired utilities to contain their coal ash so it’s not allowed to continue to pollute our waterways. But McKinley is not alone — he had some help from the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, the organization currently under fire for providing industry the means to unduly influence our elected officials.

McKinley’s bill, H.R. 2273, would literally prevent the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from protecting families from the water and air pollution associated with poor storage and disposal of coal ash, the toxic remnants of coal-burning.

Last Wednesday, McKinley attached the entire toxic bill as an amendment to the “must-pass” House version of the Transportation Bill. With the Senate version already passed a few weeks ago, there will now be a conference of House and Senate members to hammer out the final Transportation bill.

Please contact your Senators and ask them to reject any amendments that would gut federal coal ash protections.

The passage of this coal ash bill would have real consequences for real people. Just ask Steven Johnson, Gloria Dorsett, Robert Deveaux and Donna Keiser, whose lives have been forever changed by the toxic menace of coal ash.

Read more
...


North Carolina Bands with Mighty Big Hearts


Monday, April 23rd, 2012
posted by jamie



A few weeks ago, Appalachian Voices was on the happy end of a rousing night of rowdy rock and roll and vintage and alt country, thanks to the generous hearts of a few North Carolina musicians.

Molly McGinn, sultry-voiced siren from the Greensboro, N.C., collaborative band, Wurlitzer Prize, and David Brewer, the massively talented musician often fronting Americana r&r favorites Possum Jenkins, hosted a fantastic evening of music as a benefit for Appalachian Voices and our work to end mountaintop removal coal mining.

In addition to a seriously fun radio “appearance” set up by the resourceful Molly, listening to some fantastic tunes by Wurlitzer Prize and Possum Jenkins into the wee hours of the night (Molly’s voice really is amazing and the Possum is always a rabble-rousing good time), and a very generous gift of the proceeds, we made some great new friends in the Triad City and hope to go back again soon.

This month marks 8 years together for Possum Jenkins — the Boone/Winston-Salem group recently released “Carolinacana,” funded entirely by fans — and is the third time David Brewer has donated his time and talents to help raise funds for Appalachian Voices.

Wurlitzer Prize is a project put together by musicians hailing from a number of well-known bands in the North Carolina Triad area, including Possum Jenkins, Amelia’s Mechanics and the Emma Gibbs Band.

A hearty thank you to both of these amazing groups — please be sure to check them out!!

Hampton Roads Vs the Coal Plant


Tuesday, April 17th, 2012
posted by mike



The effort to keep Hampton Roads air from suffering from a major new source of air and water pollution for next sixty years is picking up and your help is needed. On Tuesday Norfolk is going to vote whether to join the Consortium for Infant and Child Health (CINCH), The American Lung Association, Isle of Wight County, Southampton County, the Town of Surry and many others in opposing what could be Virginia’s largest coal-fired power plant built upwind of Hampton Roads.

If you live in Norfolk you can help steer the City Council in the right direction by sending a brief note or letter their way. You can do this easily by clicking here: http://wiseenergyforvirginia.org/norfolk/

The Norfolk City Council was originally going to vote last week but an apparent misunderstanding has led to a delay that is now allowing Norfolk Southern, which would benefit financially from the coal plant, to weigh in and offer their comments on the draft resolution of opposition. Please consider coming to their next meeting on Tuesday, April 24th. Get there by 6:45 to sign up to speak against the coal plant. You can read more about this unfortunate delay here: http://appvoices.org/2012/04/12/strange-happenings-in-norfolk/?

There are also efforts in Virginia Beach and Hampton City to pass resolutions of opposition to this massive polluting coal plant.

Read more
...


Appalachian Viewpoint: The Conservative Conservationist


Monday, April 16th, 2012
posted by jw



<<< Friends, we're thrilled to share this exclusive piece from Jim Dipeso of ConservAmerica (formerly “Republicans for Environmental Protection”) on the conservative case for stewardship. Former White House advisor Van Jones offers the progressive viewpoint in the upcoming issue of The Appalachian Voice newspaper. I hope you’ll join me in welcoming Jim and ConservAmerica to the Front Porch! We look forward to your contributions anytime. – jw>>>

by Jim Dipeso, ConservAmerica

What is a conservative after all but one who conserves, one who is committed to protecting and holding close the things by which we live… And we want to protect and conserve the land on which we live—our countryside, our rivers and mountains, our plains and meadows and forests. This is our patrimony. This is what we leave to our children. And our great moral responsibility is to leave it to them either as we found it or better than we found it. – President Ronald Reagan

President Ronald Reagan spoke those eloquent words in 1984. Reagan was a man of the land. On trips to his beloved Rancho del Cielo, he spent much time outdoors enjoying the hills and horizons.

For Reagan, stewardship of the land was as central to the conservative ethic he championed as was individual liberty and limited government.

The land is central to Appalachia’s culture. The mountains hold generations of family tales and community lore, of births, weddings, and passages, of stories told at church socials, of secret fishing spots grandfathers shared with grandsons. Ridges, woods, hollows, and streams keep alive those memories that are the warp and woof of mountain culture.

Blowing up mountaintops and burying streams under rubble does immense harm to Appalachia’s land, water, and wildlife, as scientists have documented in abundant detail. Mountaintop removal mining and stream obliteration does more, however. It disfigures the land that has shaped Appalachian life for generations. It brings noise, stress, anxiety, and disruption to families and communities.

Opposing mountaintop removal mining and dumping of waste into streams does not mean opposing coal mining. Nor does taking such a position make a conservative less conservative. As Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tennessee) has said, “Coal is an essential part of our energy future, but it is not necessary to destroy our mountaintops in order to have enough coal to meet our needs.”

Senator Alexander is correct. Now and for years to come, coal will have an important place in America’s energy portfolio. Our task is to find better ways to produce and use coal, to lighten its burdens on our land, water, and air. Finding those better ways will be hard but America excels at doing hard things.

The land gives us riches and it embodies our heritage. Being better stewards of the land is the gift we give our children, as Ronald Reagan reminded us.

Van Jones’ “Rebuilding the Dream” (excerpt)


Monday, April 16th, 2012
posted by jw



In his newest book, Rebuild the Dream, green economy pioneer Van Jones reflects on his journey from grassroots outsider to White House insider, shares intimate details of his time in government, and provides a blueprint to reinvent the American Dream. Along the way, he contrasts the structure and rhetoric of the 2008 Obama campaign, the Tea Party movement and Occupy Wall Street. Below are his thoughts on cheap patriots versus deep patriots, and the way forward to reclaim, reinvent, and renew the American Dream. You can order the book here.

CHEAP PATRIOTS VERSUS DEEP PATRIOTS

The time has come to turn things right side up again and declare that America’s honest, hard-working middle class is too big to fail. The aspirations of our low-income, struggling, and marginalized communities are too big and important to fail. The hopes of our children are too big to fail. The American Dream itself is too big to fail.

And we are not going to let these things fail.

Of course, it will not be easy to stop the dream killers. Tax policy that burdens working families and gives the biggest breaks to the super-rich has helped to keep more and more of our national wealth locked in the private safes of the top 1 percent. This alarming economic polarization, combined with the constant flow of good-paying jobs overseas, threatens to end our status as a middle class nation. Too many of our big banks and largest corporations are behaving in a manner that is both irresponsible and unpatriotic. Their conduct makes it that much worse for the many patriotic and responsible businesses—especially small businesses—that follow the rules and provide good jobs to their employees.

Additionally, many well-intentioned people have been recruited into a powerful crusade—the Tea Party movement—that promises the American people economic relief by slashing taxes and taking a wrecking ball to America’s government. The impact of the Tea Party’s reckless policies would be to financially decimate our government, further dismantle America’s middle class, and strengthen the chokehold that the top 1 percent has on the economy. Nonetheless, the Tea Partiers effectively seized the public narrative in 2009 and congressional power in 2010, quelling the wave of hope generated by the 2008 election. They have succeeded at painting their agenda “red, white, and blue.” If we are to have an economy that works for the remaining 99 percent, this kind of “cheap patriotism” must be sidelined in favor of a “deep patriotism”—one that honors the accomplishments of our parents and grandparents. After all, they used the tools of both free enterprise and democratic government to build a society that sets the global standard.

THE BATTLE IS JOINED

Fortunately, a new force has emerged with the long-term potential to both repair America’s democracy and renew the American Dream. A massive protest movement has risen within the United States, eclipsing the Tea Party…

Read more
...


Strange Happenings in Norfolk


Thursday, April 12th, 2012
posted by mike



Norfolk could be on the verge of becoming the fourth Hampton Roads locality to officially oppose the largest coal fired power plant ever proposed in Virginia. It appears, however, that a few strange events occurred in the last couple weeks that kept it from coming to a vote and could potentially make the resolution of opposition language weak or not happen at all.

Members of the public, several Norfolk City Council members and I, were under the impression (based on discussion at the previous meeting) that the council was going to vote whether or not to adopt a resolution of opposition during their most recent, April 10th, council meeting.

For some reason, that isn’t what happened.

The resolution made it onto the agenda for discussion but through an apparent miscommunication or misunderstanding it didn’t make it onto the agenda for an actual vote. This was quite a disappointment to the council members and Norfolk citizens who had been hoping to see it voted on this week.

You can see the discussion and frustration over the delay yourself in the YouTube video below of Tuesday’s meeting. Watch as long as you like but I think you’ll get the point in the first five minutes, or by minute 47.

During the discussion it was also revealed that the chairman of Norfolk Southern called the city on Monday and asked to be able to review the resolution and to provide comments on it. (For clarity’s sake, I should point out that the agenda was printed on Friday.) Given the delay and Norfolk Southern’s sudden interest in the city council’s actions, there is now a chance that the support for a resolution of opposition could be eroded by corporate interests. It is no secret that the rail line that would service the coal plant should it ever get built, is owned by Norfolk Southern and that the corporation has a financial interest in seeing the project go forward.

I found it troubling to hear reports that the presentation on the coal plant from staff was watered down at this full council meeting as compared to the presentation from staff to the Health, Education and Family two weeks earlier. You can view the most recent presentation here if you’d like. While I completely understand that staff must remain impartial and that their job is to leave it up to council to make the decision, I don’t think that impartiality means leaving out relevant and pertinent facts. I was disappointed that the presenter skipped over the fact that the town of Surry (the seat of Surry County) passed a unanimous resolution against the plant yet she pointed out that the resolutions passed by Isle of Wight and Southampton County were not unanimous. She also failed to mention the one study that used EPA methodologies to look at potential health affects which concluded that pollution from the coal plant would adversely affect the health of downwind residents. I think the council would want to know that the damage every year would include an estimated 16 cases of chronic bronchitis, 23 asthma-related emergency room visits, 26 premature deaths, 40 heart attacks, 442 asthma attacks, 3,340 lost work days, and 19,903 days in which people will have to reduce their activities because they are sick. One third of these health problems would be in Virginia, with the rest spread across the mid-Atlantic region. The total cost to society of these illnesses and deaths would be about $208 million a year—or more than $6 billion over a generation (30 years). For more information on the coal plant click here.

Also curious was the fact that at the previous meeting in late March, only one resolution had been discussed -an outright resolution of opposition to be presented for an up or down vote at the early April meeting. Without the consent or knowledge of the full city council, staff was directed to write two resolutions, one an outright resolution of opposition to the coal plant and the other a weaker letter expressing only concern and stating that the city would monitor the situation.

While the reason for the delay and for the drafting of this second, weaker, resolution isn’t clear these events allow Norfolk Southern and the Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (ODEC) additional time to weigh in and encourage the council to pass a weaker resolution or no resolution at all. We need to make sure that no council member gets the interests of their “corporate citizens” and their actual citizens confused. After all, the operations of a large corporation like Norfolk Southern can survive worsening air quality while, on the other hand, the living and breathing citizens of Norfolk and Hampton Roads have real lung tissue that can get damaged on “Code-Red” air days and real asthmatics and sufferers of COPD that can actually experience shorter lives as a result of living downwind of a coal plant.

I think the majority of the council is on the right track, but to keep them there it is more important than ever that many more Norfolk residents let their City Council know that they fully support an official resolution of opposition.

The vote will occur a the April 24th Norfolk City Council Meeting starting at 7:00 PM. If you are a Norfolk resident and want to attend and speak (which I highly encourage you to do) you should get there by 6:45 to sign up with the clerk. In the mean time, you can click here to send a letter to all the council members, and mayor. Grassroots, citizen pressure is the best tool in overcoming the interests of powerful corporations like Norfolk Southern and utilities like ODEC. Letters from citizens are one of the most powerful tools in swaying council member’s votes.

We must make sure that the council feels the support of all Norfolk citizens in opposing this coal plant that would be so detrimental to the health of all Hampton Roads residents.

Guest Post: I Believe! I mean, sort of…Well, not really…


Thursday, April 5th, 2012
posted by mike



Here is a great blog post from “Activist and Mom” Betsy Shepard who has been fighting a proposal to build the largest coal plant in Virginia a few miles from her family’s home in Surry County. She points out the incredible hypocrisy of the coal industry’s rhetoric around greenhouse gas emissions in the face of the new EPA rule. Be sure to check out her blog here.

When I first heard about the coal plant, I was fairly indifferent. I didn’t know much about coal or electricity generation.

What I did know was that coal had cleaned up their act significantly.

How did I know that?

Easy. I watched ad after ad telling me so during the presidential debates and election news.
The ads were the work of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) – some sort of lobby/marketing group for the coal industry.

They were pretty convincing. All mom and apple pie and American ingenuity and welcoming and meeting any challenge.

Here’s Steve Miller, their president, talking about the launch of their 2008 campaign–the “I Believe” ads:

CO2 emissions? No problem! he says. “We’ll meet that challenge!” Boo-ya!

Here’s the actual “I Believe” ad:

Read more
...


Over the Line


Wednesday, April 4th, 2012
posted by thom



A lot has been made of EPA’s proposed greenhouse gas rules, but a quotation from Cecil Roberts, President of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) will likely grab the most headlines.

The Navy SEALs shot Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and Lisa Jackson shot us in Washington. – Cecil Roberts, 4/3/12

Sure, it’s pretty offensive, but let’s just focus on how overblown and wrong the statement is.

First of all, the proposed rule would only apply to future coal fired power plants that have not broken ground for construction within the next 12 months. In other words, all of the 1,226 coal fired power plants across the country will have to do exactly nothing under the proposed rule. They will continue to burn the same amount of coal as they would without the rule.

We’ve heard an uproar from the UMWA but there’s a reason environmental groups offered such tame applause. In practice, this rule would not change all that much. According to the proposal, EPA anticipates the rule “will result in negligible changes in GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions over the analysis period (2020).” Hardly worth popping the champagne over. Keep in mind that the United Nations International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) calls for a 25%-40% reduction of GHGs below 1990 levels by 2020 in order to avoid catastrophic impacts from climate change.


Read more
...


The EPA’s New Carbon Rule, Getting Serious About Climate Change


Sunday, April 1st, 2012
posted by brian



New EPA regulations that will cut carbon emissions that contribute to climate change and impact human health will become law later this year.

So we’re a little late to the punch on this one. Let’s take a moment to catch up. Last Tuesday, March 27, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency released the first-ever rules regulating carbon pollution from power plants. For those who didn’t already know this news, I should also mention this is not an April Fool’s joke, nor would it be a particularly funny one if it were.

The Tuesday announcement from the EPA represents the findings of a several year-process, beginning in 2007 with a U.S. Supreme Court decision. The ruling that got the ball rolling found that, under the Clean Air Act, the EPA could regulate greenhouse gas pollution that threatens Americans’ health and welfare by making us sick and contributing to global climate change and. But not only do they have the authority to regulate greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, they’re required to, unless they could prove a scientific basis for their refusal, the court ruled further.

Read more
...


Asheville’s Call to Action: The Beginning of the End for Toxic Coal Ash


Friday, March 30th, 2012
posted by cavanaughpd



It’s hard to miss the Asheville coal-fired power plant as you drive into Lake Julian Park in Arden, N.C. The smokestacks and discolored water surrounding the plant scream of environmental abuse and disfigurement. Our mission was the hidden abuses this plant perpetrates on nearby residents that brought us together specifically to discuss the threat of toxic coal ash.

Thursday, March 22, was more than just a warm welcome to spring, it marked the nineteenth annual World Water Day, a day to focus international attention on the impacts of rapid urban development, industrial consumption and climate change threatening our precious resources.

The “Clean Water Not Coal Ash” rally, hosted by Appalachian Voices, the Western North Carolina Alliance along with several organizations, called attention to the threat posed by coal ash to drinking water and the nation’s rivers. The rally brought out more than 200 residents of all ages from Asheville and surrounding areas demanding something be done about the threat of toxic coal ash to North Carolina’s waterways.

Our message was simple: Keep our precious water clean for current and future generations.

Read more
...


Premium Coal Fined for New River Damage


Thursday, March 29th, 2012
posted by jw



Appalachian Voices is very happy to see the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) order a fine on Jim Justice’s Premium Coal after a January “black water” spill from a coal preparation plant sullied 28 miles of the New River. Initially, the fine will be $50,000, with the possibility of up to $196,000 in fines.

Much more below from our friends at Statewide Organizing for Community eMpowerment (SOCM)

Read more
...


TN Legislators Miss Another Opportunity to Protect State’s Mountains


Tuesday, March 27th, 2012
posted by molly



House Subcommittee Kills Mountaintop Removal Ban
With Delay Tactic

In yet another act of political cowardice on the issue of mountaintop removal coal mining, a Tennessee House subcommittee voted to kill the Scenic Vistas Protection Act and for the second time to send it to summer study.

Despite a passionate plea by bill sponsor Rep. Michael Ray McDonald, the Conservation and Environment Subcommittee voted 6 to 4 to avoid a direct vote and instead condemn the bill to a summer study session which has no authority to vote on legislation. Representatives Richard Floyd, David Hawk, Ron Lollar, Pat Marsh, Frank Niceley and John C. Tidwell all cast pro-mountaintop removal votes. Representatives who voted to hear the bill were Charles Curtiss, Brenda Gilmore, Mike Kernell and Art Swann.

“When this bill was introduced in 2008 there were 5 mountains permitted for surface coal mining above two thousand feet in Tennessee. Now there are 13,” Rep. McDonald said to the subcommittee. “We have lost eight mountains since 2008 by delaying. If we don’t vote this year, we will lose more mountains. Without our mountains, Tennessee is not Tennessee.”

Read more
...


Critical Vote Today in Tennessee Legislature


Tuesday, March 27th, 2012
posted by jw



Mountaintop Removal Makes Us Sick, Takes Away Our Jobs, and Destroys Our Mountains. What Else is Left to Study?

The Scenic Vistas Protection Act is closer to passage than ever before. TODAY (Mar. 27) at 12 p.m. CST, the Tennessee House Environment Subcommittee will vote on whether or not to protect Tennessee’s mountains from the damages of mountaintop removal coal mining.

One tactic that the coal lobby is using is to push for delay into “summer study,” with Representatives saying that they need more information on the issue. But there’s a problem with their line of thinking. First, this bill has been around for 5 years. They’ve had time to read it, consider it, and study it. Heck, they’ve had time to etch it into stone if they want. Its not a new bill.

Secondly, there are dozens if not hundreds of studies documenting the negative impacts mountaintop removal is having on our health, our economy, and our state. These studies don’t make the issue more complex. They make it extremely simple. Mountaintop removal is bad for our health, its bad for business, and its bad for Tennessee. Period. Any vote for delay is a vote for more mountaintop removal, and that is unacceptable.

Some members of the committee remain uncommitted. Thats why we need you to make a few phone calls right now. They must hear Tennesseans speak with one voice in support of the Scenic Vistas Protection Act:

These members of the House Environment Subcommittee remain uncommitted.
Curtiss, Charles (D-43) - (615) 741-1963
Floyd, Richard (R-27) – (615) 741-2746
Hawk, David (R-5) – (615) 741-7482
Lollar, Ron (R-99) – (615) 741-7084
Marsh, Pat (R-62) – (615) 741-6824
Swann, Art (R-8) – (615) 741-5481
Tidwell, John (D-74) – (615) 741-7098

Please call these members and ask them to vote AYE on the Scenic Vistas Protection Act. This simple bill will protect Tennessee’s mountaintops and virgin ridgelines from the damages of mountaintop removal.

WOW! More than Two Dozen Republicans, Democrats, and Independents Cosponsor Scenic Vistas Act


Monday, March 26th, 2012
posted by jw



New Cosponsors Swarming as Advocates Prepare for Critical Test Tuesday

Tonight a host of House Republicans, Democrats, and the state’s sole elected Independent signed on as cosponsors of the Tennessee Scenic Vistas Protection Act, signaling an unprecedented shift in momentum for our efforts to protect Tennessee’s Mountains. The bill is scheduled for a critical vote tomorrow (3/27) at 1PM EST in the House Environment Subcommittee.

A big Appalachian THANK YOU to the new cosponsors of the Scenic Vistas Act, listed below…

Read more
...