By Julie Johnson
Duke Energy customers and concerned citizens are challenging the North Carolina electric utilities provider over a proposed 18 percent rate increase.
The utility provider is proposing a 13.5 percent increase for residential consumers to support the projected $1.8 billion costs of an 825 megawatt upgrade to the coal-fired Cliffside Steam Station in Rutherford County, N.C.
Added to the initial 13.5 percent will be another 4.5 percent to cover the rising cost of coal.
Duke Energy says that the current rate is “not sufficient to meet day-to-day expenses, build cleaner and more reliable energy
infrastructure, provide a fair return to our investors, and maintain a strong financial position.”
Since its inception, environmental groups have challenged the Cliffside plant. A 2007 air-quality permit issued by the state was overturned a month after construction began. Environmental groups, led by the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, found that the permit violated the Clean Air Act because it did not allow for testing the station’s equipment for controlling mercury emissions. However, Duke was allowed to continue construction while the company sought and was eventually granted the necessary permit from the state.
If the rate increase is permitted, it will go into effect in January 2010. The North Carolina Utilities Commission is holding regional public hearings for citizens to voice their opinions. At the Sept. 17th hearing in Marion, N.C., Duke Energy customers and concerned citizens expressed their objections to the increase and to the Cliffside construction project.
The McDowell County school board voted unanimously to reject the rate increase. A proposed 11.2 percent rate increase for government agencies would cost the school system an additional $89,000 for the 2010 school year, an amount McDowell says it cannot fund. A representative for the Board of Education told the Utilities Commission that it was “an increase the school system, barely able to afford text books, cannot bear.”
J. Robert Boyette, City Manager of Marion, N.C., told the Utilities Commission that a proposed 16.7 percent increase in municipal outdoor lighting would impose an extra $44,000 to the already struggling city’s fiscal burden. Boyette asked on behalf of the city that the rate increase be denied.
Numerous citizens expressed their environmental concerns to the Utilities Commission. Many speakers at the hearing opposed the continued construction of the Cliffside Steam Station and the use of coal-fired energy. Dr. Lewis Patrie of the group Physicians for Social Responsibility said “many experts have concluded that we will be able to meet our future energy demands without building new coal-fired plants,” and asked for the sake of public health and the environment that Cliffside construction be halted. Lee Taylor, a Marion attorney, asked “Is it mandated that because Duke has a monopoly, consumers are asked to shoulder the burden of fulfilling their rate of return?”
On Oct. 19th, the Utility Commission will hold a hearing in Raleigh, N.C., to make the final decision on whether or not to allow the increase.
Related Articles
Latest News
More Stories
English Language Learning in Appalachia
Learning English is always difficult. But current aggressive approaches to immigration policy are creating more barriers for learners and the programs that serve them than ever before in Appalachia and beyond.
Landfill Drama
Many residents of Pike County, Kentucky, are breathing a sigh of relief since county commissioners finalized their decision to rescind a contract with an out-of-state waste management company.
Overdrive: Fossil Fuels in Appalachia
Electricity demand is on the rise. Here, we share snapshots of energy trends in the region and how methane gas, coal and data centers are affecting our communities — and how people are pushing back.
Less Support for Communities with Mine Problems
The Trump administration issued a regulation to weaken the Ten Day Notice process that helps community members call in federal enforcement when state regulators don’t do a good job policing environmental problems at coal mines
Leave a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Leave a Comment