Follow Us on Twitter: Appalachian Voices | iLoveMountains.org

Posts Tagged ‘wind energy’

Raleigh Legislature Hosts Citizens’ Lobby Day for Renewable Energy

Tuesday, June 19th, 2012 - posted by jeff


There’s just something fitting about North Carolina renewable energy advocates getting up ahead of the sun – and this is exactly what they did on Tuesday June 12th as they rolled out of bed for the 7:00 AM convening of the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Society’s Citizen Lobby Day.

Why such an early start? Renewable Energy Development in NC of course! Though the waiting hot coffee didn’t hurt.

Given the many arduous budgetary matters now before NC’s legislature, these NC fans of clean and green energy wanted to make sure that the legislature kept renewable energy development in North Carolina (now the 10th largest state in the Union), squarely on on the front burner. (more…)

Wright Bros, Georgia DOT Fined $1.5 Million for Clean Water Violations

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012 - posted by Jamie G. -- AV Communications Coordinator

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Justice will require Wright Brothers Construction Co. and the Georgia Department of Transportation to pay $1.5 million in fines for violations of the Clean Water Act between 2004 and 2007.

One of the largest fines ever assesed under the CWA, the complaint states that Wright Brothers, with approval from GDOT, buried seven primary trout streams in northeast Georgia. GDOT hired Wright Brothers to dispose of excess soil and rocks during two major highway expansion projects. More than one million cubic yards of excess rock and soil were improperly disposed of, impacting approximately 2,800 linear feet of streams.

Under the settlement, Wright Brothers and GDOT must purchase 16,920 mitigation credits at an estimated additional cost of $1.35 million to offset impacts to waters of the United States that cannot be restored. The credits must be purchased from mitigation banks servicing the area where the violations occurred.

The EPA is also requiring that Wright Brothers remove the piping and restore the bed and banks of a 150-foot stream channel that was impacted by their disposal activities. The estimated cost of the restoration is $25,000.

N.C. Proposes to Develop Offshore Wind Energy with Governor’s Support

A 15-member panel, including North Carolina Governor Bev Perdue has stated wind energy projects along North Carolina’s coast provide vast potential for clean energy production. A report released by the Governor’s office said the state’s coast had the largest offshore wind resource on the East Coast.

According to the panel, areas in North Carolina suited for wind farms could generate a yearly average of 20,000 megawatts of power. The report says that, although producing wind energy is expensive and would raise costs for ratepayers along the coast, it would provide long-term benefits in producing pollution-free energy.

Iberdrola Renewables Inc., the second largest wind operator in the U.S. has proposed a 300-megawatt project called “Desert Wind” near Elizabeth City, N.C. The project is currently on hold because no utilities have offered to enter a long-term deal to fund the $600 million wind farm.

Iberdrola acknowledges the difficulty in investing in long-term power supply deals because natural gas prices in the U.S. are at a ten-year low. A poor economy has complicated efforts by wind developers to secure deals with utilities that do not immediately need the power.

Energizing the Clean Economy

Friday, October 14th, 2011 - posted by brian

How Efficiency Creates Jobs and Saves Money

Political speeches, the nightly news and newspaper headlines are filled with reminders of the battered economy and the millions unemployed or underpaid. But as energy efficiency and renewable technologies advance, more domestic jobs are created that foster a sustainable economy, save money at home, and benefit human health and the environment. It’s an ambitious goal, but across Appalachia, many forward-th
inkers and industry leaders have already seen the light.

By Brian Sewell

Mike McKechnie keeps both a lump of coal and a piece of silicon, the main component in solar cells, on his desk.

He knows the direction of the nation’s energy future comes in part from knowing its past. The owner of Mountain View Solar & Wind in Berkeley Springs, W.Va., McKechnie has spent years promoting energy efficiency and the benefits of solar and wind power.

“We’ve always been concerned in giving the consumer education,” McKechnie says. “It helps them manage the utility bill that is so important to them. Once we have their attention, we can show them the energy saving components and translate that to dollars.”

Trainings for green-collar workers are helping create domestic jobs nationwide. Photo courtesy of CREATES

When McKechnie and his wife purchased a home from the U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon in 2005, they began hosting energy efficiency, solar technology and green building trainings in their backyard. “We’re middle class folks,” McKechnie says. “It was our way of showing how people like us can afford an efficient, healthy home.”

Before focusing solely on renewable energy, McKechnie operated Mountain View Builders, using his knowledge of green building practices. “We had our most successful years in 2008 and 2009, when most builders were suffering or completely out of business,” he says. “The reason we were busy is because of the products and services we offered: a healthier place to live that uses significantly less power.”

McKechnie and others give credit to the federal and state incentives, loans and grant programs that encourage homeowners to retrofit their homes and invest in energy efficiency, weatherization and green job training. But in order to keep energy efficiency and clean energy growing, McKechnie says, the tax credits must stay at the consumer level.

Every state has its own tax credits and incentives to motivate energy efficiency. North Carolina residents and businesses receive a 35 percent tax rebate for installing renewable energy systems. In Kentucky’s Appalachian counties, the Mountain Association for Community Economic Development offers loans to small and mid-sized businesses, non-profits, schools and municipalities through its Energy Efficient Enterprises program. Tennessee’s Green Energy Tax Credit encourages the clean economy by providing large tax breaks to industries in the clean energy supply chain.

Federal tax credits for energy efficiency also exist, though in smaller amounts than previous years. Home efficiency retrofits, the purchase of many Energy Star-rated appliances and installation of renewable energy all come with incentives put in place by the Department of Energy.

But it was the controversial and oft-criticized American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 that rejuvenated research and investment in clean energy. A total of $27.2 billion was doled out by the Department of Energy, including $5 billion for weatherizing modest-income homes, $300 million for energy efficient appliance rebates. The Department of Labor gave grants of $500 million to fund the training of “green-collar” workers. The Brookings Institute cites that, in addition to creating jobs in a recession, loan programs generated $4 to $8 of private lending for every dollar of public investment and by scaling up important clean energy technologies, began financing the long-term restructuring of the economy.

Photo courtesy of CREATES

Community Housing Partners, a non-profit in Christiansburg, Va. that creates affordable, sustainable housing for low-income families, was awarded $3.8 million through the Recovery Act’s Department of Labor “Energy Training Partnership” grant to provide green job training in emerging industries. From that grant, the Construction, Retrofitting, and Energy-Efficiency Assessment Training and Employment System (CREATES) program began.

Virginia Tech University, a CREATES partner, approached Community Housing Partners prior to applying for the grant to discuss developing training initiatives for workers already involved with or interested in green construction fields.

“Virginia Tech worked with the local community colleges to look at their current construction curriculum,” the employer outreach specialist for CREATES, Jackie Pontious, explains.
Community Housing Partners is then responsible for adding a “green shell” to the curriculum already in place. An example would be a solar energy component added to an electrical engineering course.

“We recognize the need to train them for the needs of today and prepare them for the needs of the future,” Pontious says.

The partnership’s trainings are rooted in a collaboration between community colleges, each specializing in a different aspect of green construction. New River Community College in Dublin, Va. concentrates on Wind and Solar Technology training; Virginia Western Community College in Roanoke focuses on energy management training; Wythesville Community College, located in a town with several contractors, is most fit to train in building compliance. Trainees pursue associates degrees and industry certifications in courses ranging from electrical engineering to weatherization fundamentals. The end goal? A job in the clean economy.

According to the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Southern states are among the most inefficient in the country.

Pontious identifies employment opportunities for CREATES trainees by meeting with local trade organizations and hosting job fairs with existing green construction firms in southwest Virginia. A CREATES trainee may find work as a weatherization technician with a non-profit like WAMY Community Action, a western North Carolina organization that fights poverty in four counties through grassroots approaches that help people help themselves.

In a recent report, WAMY documented that in the 258 homes they weatherized with support from the Recovery Act, energy costs were reduced by nearly 30 percent annually — a critical difference for families who once spent an average 15 percent of their annual income on energy costs.

But the prolonged success of regional initiatives in the clean economy depends on more than government funding and well-trained workers. Communities suffering from the rising cost of electricity from fossil fuels are also rallying find clean energy solutions.

Rory McIlmoil, a project manager at Downstream Strategies, an environmental consulting firm in Alderson, W.Va., is concerned with the need for economic diversification and intelligent approaches to creating a more energy-efficient future in Appalachian coal regions. Using a grant from the Appalachian Regional Commission, McIlmoil is working with residents of Alderson on a community energy plan to invest in cleaner, more sustainable energy sources and systems.

“My experience in Alderson has proven to me that folks in rural areas are deeply concerned about rising energy costs,” McIlmoil says. “They see the growing impact it has on their disposable income.”

The Alderson plan calls on residents to assist in outlining goals and creating a vision for greening the community, with McIlmoil and Downstream Strategies providing technical support.
“Small towns have small budgets,” says McIlmoil. “But towns like Alderson are a perfect place to focus and plan initiatives. The buildings are aging and utilities costs are rising. There is a lot of opportunity and a willingness on the part of the people and local government.”

Community energy plans are gaining support for sustainable solutions from community members like the Green Team in Alderson, W. Va. Photo courtesy of Downstream Strategies

“I see this growth happening pretty rapidly,” he says. But is it going to help save West Virginia’s economy? I don’t know.”

Across the state, Mike McKechnie shares McIlmoil’s sense of urgency. Collaborating with the Williamson, W.Va.-based JOBS Project on a broad initiative called Sustainable Williamson, McKechnie recently began training local residents, some of whom are second- and third-generation coal miners.

“It’s not an accident that we train coal miners,” McKechnie says. “They want their children to learn about solar and energy efficiency. They know it’s the future. The West Virginia coal miner put the nation on the map during the first industrial revolution. They should get a shot at the next one.”

Industry leaders like Mike McKechnie are defining the clean economy. Photo courtesy of Mountain View Solar

Nick Mullins was a fourth-generation Virginia coal miner before he left the industry for a new life.

“When I graduated high school the highest paying jobs around were coal industry jobs,” Mullins says.

It was after becoming an electrician in the mines that Mullins saw a new side of mining.

“The damage to the economy and the environment lit a fire in me,” Mullins says. “When I saw the high concentration of cancer and my community’s health suffering, I knew it was time to think about a life beyond coal.”

Mullins, now living in Berea, Ky. with his wife and two children, received financial aid from the Kentucky Solar Partnership and, with the help of Eastern Kentucky University, is starting Power Savers, LLC while he pursues other trainings in building performance.

“Efficiency is the quickest, easiest way to save money on energy,” Mullins says. “If we continue on this path, it’s easy to see how we can turn the economy around. But we need to learn how to live more healthy, efficient lives. It’s not just about saving money and the environment. It’s about saving coal miners too.”

With regional initiatives, development and support for green-collar jobs, a more economically and environmentally sustainable future is within reach. A future everyone in Appalachia — and America — can be proud of.

How TVA Could Lead Utilities Into the Future

Thursday, February 5th, 2009 - posted by Anna

Story by Bill Kovark

Old fashioned utilities used to make money by selling electric power. In a bygone era, making money by NOT selling electric power seemed unthinkable.
A few weeks ago, Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine stood the old logic on its ear by saying that “it just makes no sense” not to conserve.

“Under current law, we guarantee a rate of return for a utility building a new coal plant, but not for investments that promote conservation,” Kaine said in a Jan. 14 State of the Commonwealth address.

As it turns out, Virginia is only catching up by recognizing this new reality for electric production. In most states, conservation services have already become a standard part of the utility business.

In contrast, conservation and renewable energy programs at TVA and most other utilities in the Appalachian region have been half-hearted at best. But doesn’t have to be that way, many people are insisting.

“TVA was born out of crippling economic times,” said Southern Alliance for Clean Energy chair Steven Smith. “As we find ourselves again in difficult times, this is an opportunity to remake TVA as an effective utility in the 21st century.”

TVA’s average electric rates are low. The agency’s 6.96 cents per kilowatt compares favorably with California’s average 11.8 cents per kilowatt. Yet, California consumers use 50 percent less electricity, in effect, paying less than TVA consumers for the same service, and with less pollution.

The difference in approaches between TVA and more progressive utilities involves the idea of making money from saving energy as well as producing it.

Most utilities offer at least some token conservation incentives to consumers. TVA offers residents of Sevier County, for example, $100 for buying an energy efficient water heater or loans for heat pumps. Still, it’s a far cry from, say, the $5,000 of rebates per residence available in Riverside CA, or the Burbank, CA green building incentive of up to $30,000. These rebates avoid new power cost, and the value of this avoided cost can be high.

Conservation is valuable

The cost of new power plants has gone up by about 70 percent in three years, according to a May 27, 2008 Wall Street Journal article, making the value of energy conservation all the greater.

The value of avoiding a kilowatt hour of production can vary from 5.3 cents to 15.7 cents, considering the cost of emissions control as well as a portion of the national security benefit of reducing oil use, according to Charles Gicchetti of the University of Southern California.

For example, the Natural Resources Defense Council estimated that the benefit of saving energy from Duke Power Company’s controversial new Cliffside power plant in North Carolina would be between 3 and 6.3 cents per kilowatt hour, considering the avoided cost minus the actual expense of conservation efforts.

In Virginia recently, a governor’s commission reported that energy conservation measures could reduce current electric consumption by at least 19 percent by 2025, even with adjustments for population growth.

“Our long-term planning should recognize that conservation is just as important an energy source as new construction,” Kaine said. “We should treat conservation investments at least as favorably as new generation investments, and my bill will do that.”

TVA has a small wind energy program, and voluntary purchases of green power are available at about 2.6 cents extra per kilowatt hour. But in 43 states, Renewable Portfolio Standards mandate that utilities will produce a portion of the state’s energy with wind, solar, biomass or other renewable energy sources.

Virginia and North Carolina both passed legislation last year requiring 12 percent of energy production from renewable sources by 2022.

TVA doesn’t need to wait for state legislation. As a federal agency, it has always been
expected to lead. Or, at the very least, it doesn’t need permission to follow.

“TVA must be a living laboratory, modeling a clean energy future heavily invested in energy efficiency, renewable energy and smart-grid technology,” Smith said in his Senate hearing testimony.