Follow Us on Twitter: Appalachian Voices | iLoveMountains.org

Archive for June, 2006

Study on Certified Forests, Forest Products Sets Stage for Educational Programs

Friday, June 30th, 2006 - posted by Appalachian Voices

[Louisiana] This and other results of the study conducted with landowners in Louisiana and Mississippi by researchers at the LSU AgCenter and Mississippi State University will be used to provide the background needed for developing a Web site and handbook on forestland certification, said Dr. Richard Vlosky, director of the Louisiana Forest Products Development Center in the LSU AgCenter. Nearly half of the landowners who responded stated they understand the concept of forest certification well or to some degree, Vlosky said. But more than three-quarters are unwilling to bear the cost of certification. Of the 123 home centers that responded, one-third said they sell certified wood products and that those products make up an average of 38 percent of their wood product sales by value, Vlosky said. “For the landowner, home center responses mean certification is growing and demand for this market segment is growing,” Vlosky said. “If landowners want to sell to a mill that sells to those home centers, they need to be aware of the market conditions involved in certifying timberland.” “These landowners need to see the cost benefit of certification,” Vlosky said, pointing out that nearly 80 percent said they are unwilling to certify their forestlands. “They’re unclear of the link between their land and the market dynamic,”

Related story: Lumber companies want wood certified

News notes are courtesy of Southern Forests Network News Notes
www.southernsustainableforests.org

Coal and Global Warming

Friday, June 30th, 2006 - posted by jw

This month, U.S. P.I.R.G., released a report called “ The Carbon Boom: National and State Trends in Carbon Dioxide Emissions Since 1960”.

A lot of people ask me, why do you care about air pollution? Global warming is going to be the only problem we’ll be worrying about in 50 years.

Well, with such a complicated issue as global warming (I challenge anybody to find something more complicated than global warming) PIRG does us the favor of making the connection between coal mining, power production, coal-fired power plants, air quality, and… gasp!…Global Warming.

I’d encourage you to read the whole thing, but here is my attempt to give you the short and easy story through graphs and the magic of

blockquotes

…tech geeks, number nerds, and ye of great courage and a stout heart, proceed…

A dramatic growth in oil emissions from the transportation sector and coal emissions from electricity generation fueled the rapid increase in U.S. carbon dioxide emissions between 1960 and 2001.

83% of our global warming pollution is energy related CO2.

Over half (54%) of America’s energy comes from coal.

Coal has the highest carbon content of any fossil fuel, meaning that burning coal for electricity produces more carbon per unit of energy than does burning oil or natural gas, which contain about 25 percent and 45 percent less carbon than coal, respectively.61 While coal-fired power plants produced 53 percent of U.S. electricity in 2001, they emitted 82 percent of carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation.

And we’re using more and more and more and more of it…

…carbon dioxide emissions from coal combustion in the electricity sector skyrocketed from 1960 to 2001, increasing by 370 percent, as demand for electricity boomed. In 2001, the electricity sector was responsible for 90 percent of total U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from coal combustion.

Twenty-eight (28) states more than doubled their carbon dioxide emissions between 1960 and 2001.

What about the Southeast? Georgia, North Carolina, and Kentucky were all in the top 8 fastest growers.

Carbon dioxide emissions from coal increased most rapidly in the Southeast United States, which also saw the largest increase in new coal-fired power plant capacity over the four decades studied. Coal emissions in the Southeast rose by 408.9 million metric tons from 1960 to 2001, an increase of 185 percent; at the same time, coal-fired power plant capacity exploded, increasing by 84,000 megawatts (MW), or 350 percent.


Excuse the fuzzy graphics. It basically says that Appalachian states increased their % of coal-fired power plant pollution at a FAR greater rate than the rest of the country, which averaged a 40% incresae from 1960-2001. WV increased its coal-powered CO2 pollution 87%. Thats how we compare.

Carbon dioxide emissions from coal climbed 1.1 billion metric tons between 1960 and 2001, accounting for 40 percent of the total increase in U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. Increased electricity generation from coal-fired power plants fueled this rapid growth. Emissions from coal combustion in the electricity sector skyrocketed from 1960 to 2001, increasing by 370 percent, as demand for electricity boomed.

Simple huh?

Going to see Al Gore’s movie on global warming tonight – An Inconvenient Truth. I am very much looking forward to it.

Think Progress has more.

WV Net-metering

Friday, June 30th, 2006 - posted by jw

If you live in WV and think that we need further incentives for renewable energy, stand with OHVEC today and submit a comment to the Public Service Commission about net-metering in West Virginia!

They have sample letters, talking points, everything.

Heres the skinny on net-metering (its awesome.)
1) Small scale electricity production (solar, wind, bio-mass, it doesnt matter)
2) You produce more than you use, and have a surplus
3) The surplus goes back ONTO the grid
4) Power company sends YOU a check for once (rather than the other way around)

Net-metering gives people incentives to practice small-scale, sustainable, and local production. It is how we will create a sustainable ad safe domestic energy supply. It also puts money in your pocket every month.
image
West Virginia is one of just 11 remaining states that does not allow net-metering. 22 states have net-metering for all consumers.

So, today is the last day to SUBMIT COMMENTS. So I’d recommend doing it before lunch (and after.) :)

NC Roundup

Friday, June 30th, 2006 - posted by jw

What’s going on around North Carolina, with an everlasting tip-of-the-hat to NC ConNet.

Are there organizations in other states that do what they do? Compile all the major environmental stories from state and national media and send it out in a daily email? Its great!

Attorney General Roy Cooper has been hard at work to protect out air quality. This week, he asked a federal appeals court to review the EPA’s denial of his request for action on out-of-state air pollution blowing into North Carolina.

NC’s birding trail takes shape.

Environmentalists accused state utility companies Tuesday of overestimating future energy needs to justify their plans to build more nuclear and coal-burning power plants.

The fight to save hemlocks marches on.

Appalachian Students voted overwhelmingly for a $5 fee increase to go towards renewable energy. They’ve raised over $150,000, and even more importantly, raised awareness.

Saving farms is not about nostalgia. As change continues at its rapidly accelerating pace, having protected private land on which to grow crops could become an important part of the American economy.

That outrageous bill to allow North Carolina billboard companies to cut down twice as many public trees on public property would probably also raise your city and county property taxes.

The town of Bryson City finalized a conservation easement this month that will protect a 750-acre tract known as Lands Creek

Agri-Ethanol Products LLC plans to build North Carolina’s first ethanol plant in Beaufort County. The plant would use locally grown corn to make 100 million gallons a year..

It is fitting that North Carolina, Virginia and Tennessee are leading the fight to keep new roads out of old forests. National forests in the three states are some of the most stunningly beautiful and environmentally sensitive in the country.

Conservancy officials try to stop poaching of Venus flytraps.

Economics of Strip Mining

Thursday, June 29th, 2006 - posted by jw

Chris Irwin at United Mountain Defense just delivered one of the most awesome point-by-point refutation of every coal industry talking point ever.
Stat-by-stat, and state-by-state, Chris refutes Congressman Duncan’s (R TN-1) silly hogwash about “jobs and economics and helping poor people” as the reason for continuing mountaintop removal and strip mining. Everyone, by now, should know that WV is the poorest state in the country, mining jobs have been cut 90% (from a high of about 150,000 to currently about 15,000) with just as much coal output as before, and that the coal counties of Appalachia are some of the poorest in the country. C’mon congressman. Listen to Chris Irwin! He knows his stuff…

Thanks Chris!

“We are not burdened by below market long term pricing contracts and because our workforce is not unionized we do not have the extensive union pension and health care liabilities, including black lung liabilities and post-retirement medical
benefits, that impact many of our competitors.”

National Coal Corporation SEC filing1

This is an economics article about strip mining in Tennessee. I begin by showing data about the common economic effects in other Appalachian States, and Counties other than Tennessee, in that order. From that I will compare Tennessee and Tennessee counties–with data on Campbell, Scott, Anderson and Claiborne Counties.

“When you consider this petition, I hope you will keep in mind that when we drastically limit domestic energy production, it both destroys jobs and drives up prices. When this happens, it hurts the poor and low income and working people most of all.”

Jimmy Duncan
Congressmen
To OSM in Support of Strip miner
National Coal

Unfortunately for Congressmen Duncan his argument is incorrect in regards to the destructive practice of strip mining which he is supporting with this statement.
Mining data from both the industry and the regulatory agencies in West Virginia, Kentucky and Virginia demonstrates one thing–as strip mining increases, jobs decrease.

Hundreds of thousands of mining jobs have disappeared while more coal is removed from the Appalachians than ever. Why is this? Dynamite is cheaper than
people. Modern strip mining is heavily mechanized and employs as few people as possible. Strip mining companies do not hire nearly as many miners as traditional deep mining 300 ton drag scoops and town-house sized bulldozers now do the jobs that used to employ miners. Here is the economic data on coal and coal jobs on a state by state basis.

West Virginia

In 1949 West Virginia produced 122,913,540 tons of coal. At this time 121,121 people were employed by mining in West Virginia. Contrast those numbers with 2004 when only an estimated 16,037 were employed in mining. That’s a drop of over 105,043 mining jobs in West Virginia in a 56 year period. How much coal was produced in West Virginia in 2004? 153,631,633 tons. That’s 30,714,093
more tons of coal that were produced in 2004 than 1949, with 105,043 fewer workers. Additionally membership in the mining unions plummeted during
this period undermining miners’ ability to collectively bargain for items such
as wages, health insurance and safe mining conditions. The reason for the plummeting of the membership is apparent: fewer miners.2

Kentucky

In Kentucky in 1979 there were 47,190 people employed in mining. In 2002 that number had dropped to 17,042 people. That’s a loss of over 30,148 mining jobs!3
And coal production during that period? In 1979 Kentucky produced 67,067,653 tons of coal. In 2002 Kentucky produced 131,402,797 tons, almost double the amount of coal, with close to 1/5 of the jobs. How is this possible? It is the nature of strip mining. Strip mining by its very nature erodes and destroys miners’ jobs; it is the death knell for mining unions and more traditional deep mining techniques. Strip mining does not generate coal jobs, it destroys them. As coal from strip mines begins competing against coal from deep mines, the earth
is stripped of its coal and the miners are stripped of their jobs.

Mountain top removal and other forms of destructive strip mining don’t even have to pay for dynamite anymore; they use diesel fuel and ammonium nitrate – the same fertilizer that was used to blow up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma. With this fuel and fertilizer, strip mine companies manage to avoid even the cost of more expensive explosives. With this mix, strip miners blow off
entire ridge tops one shot (detonation) at a time.

Most of the strip mine companies are not unionized. National Coal, in the quote above, bragged about their low labor cost because they don’t have to provide their
employees with health insurance, black lung “liabilities”, and post retirement benefits. By “liabilities” they mean if any of their miners get black lung they are on their own and the state will eventually have to pick up the tab. Will
TNCARE cover black lung? Strip mining companies also externalize their costs. Maintenance for sediment dams for all eternity is on the state, so it’s cheap. After the bonds are returned, there is no one for the state to turn to for payment to repair massive landslides like those occurring all over the New River Watershed in East Tennessee. Downstream it is municipalities that have to pay to remove the sediment from the water. Toxic run-off and bright orange streams become the responsibility of either the future, or those who live downstream. Of course it’s cheap to mine when strippers don’t have to worry about blowing up streams, clear cutting entire mountainsides and wholesale destruction of watersheds– or taking care of their workers.

Virginia

In the year 2000, the Virginia coal industry was the nation’s eighth largest, in terms of tonnages produced. In Virginia the three largest coal counties are Buchanan, Dickenson, and Wise. In 1950 Virginia produced approximately 20,000,000 tons of coal. In 2000 that number was close to 40,000,000.4
The numbers of miners plummeted following the same trend as Kentucky and Virginia during that period. In 1990 10,265 miners were employed in Virginia–in 2004 that number had dropped to 4,001. Additionally, wages and amount of hours worked also dropped.5 The drop in employment was in deep mining during the same period while strip mining increased.

The Coal Counties

It is illuminating to look at the poverty rates of various coal producing counties in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and even in Tennessee. What becomes apparent is that the counties most heavily mined are often the poorest. Strip mining companies often use this to argue that the jobs they provide are important to the regions they strip. But given the billions of dollars worth of coal that has been torn and sold from these counties the poverty should not be so dire. If even
a 10th of the value taken from the counties in coal were reflected in tax dollars, income for county residents and other income these counties should be some of the richest in America–but the reality is the opposite.

West Virginia
Coal Counties

As of 2002 West Virginia was ranked # two in coal production in the nation second only to Wyoming. In 2002 WVA produced 150.1 millions of tons of coal according to the U.S.DOE Coal Industry Annual 1993-2002.

As of 1999 Clay county was the 5th poorest in West Virginia, Lincoln was the 4th
and Mingo was 3rd with over 29.7 percent of that county’s population living in poverty. McDowell is the poorest county in West Virginia and 28th poorest county in America with an average income of $10,174. Over 37.7 percent of the people in this county live in poverty.6 What do these West Virginina
counties have in common? Strip mining. These counties are some of the most
heavily mined in West Virginia.

Tennessee

West Virginia is 2nd in the nation in coal production; Kentucky is 3rd. Tennessee isn’t even in the top ten. Of non-farm jobs, what is number one in Tennessee? Tourism. Of the top five industries in the State of Tennessee, tourism – not strip mining, is king. Mining isn’t even in the top five. Travel and Tourism employs over 177,100 people in the state of Tennessee.7 Tourists do not come to see
strip mines. Decimated streams that are bright orange as a result of strip mining do not attract fishermen. Tourists come to Tennessee because of our state’s natural beauty, with good cause. Blasting the tops off of our tourist-drawing mountains for an industry that does not bring long term jobs to our state, undermines the number one sustainable employer in our state: tourism. Tennessee is 12th in the nation overall in tourism.8 This holds true even on a
county by county analysis of Tennessee counties now catching the brunt of strip
mining in Tennessee. These counties are Campbell, Claiborne, Scott and a
chunk of Anderson county.

Campbell County

“Coal production is an important segment of our local economy.”
Jerry E. Cross
Campbell County Mayor To OSM
.
No coal company is among the top 10 employers in Campbell county. In fact no coal company is even among the top 31 employers of Campbell county.9 Campbell is the 5th poorest in Tennessee with 22.8 % in poverty. The poverty rates in these Tennessee counties is similar to the poverty rates in other Appalachian counties that have had the “benefits” of King Coal. The state of Tennessee estimates that if you combine agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting and mining as one sector it totals 2.4% of the economy in Campbell county.10 This suggest that if you substract fishing, hunting, forestry, and agriculture from Campbell county’s economic base you get what is left of 2.4%. Given that some of the best hunting in Tennessee is in Campbell county and the Cumberland Plateau, it is safe to suggest that hunting alone is a significant bite out of that percentage. Arts, entertainment, recreation and food services represent over 7.1
percent of Campbell county’s economic base. That’s over triple the short term
money that strip mining brings in.

Retirement communities are a big industry moving into Campbell county.
Rarity Mountain Resort, is near Jellico, a small town located on the Tennessee-Kentucky state line. The project will combine a residential retirement community expected to include 1,000 new homes with first-class resort
facilities.11

Retirees are not moving to Tennessee counties so they can look out their window and see coal trucks, orange streams, and strip mines. Campbell county is part of the Governor Bredesen’s Three- Star Program for Community Economic Preparedness. As a basic unit of this plan is a community beautification program. Blasted mountain tops and striped clearcut hills are not conducive to a beautification program.

Scott County

Scott county is the 9th poorest in Tennessee with 22.2 % of its citizens in poverty. In Scott county, combined mining (deep and surface) with fishing, hunting and agriculture is at 2.5% while the Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation and food services, bring in 4.8% of the economy. Again, if you subtract hunting, fishing and agriculture from the percentage–and then substract deep mining–you see how little strip mining contributes to the county. Additionally, it is predictable how much damage strip mining is doing to the larger
economic contributers like hunting, fishing and tourism.

Anderson County

“Coal production is an important segment of our local economy. We support National Coal’s initiative and will do what we can to ensure our region’s economic contributions of the mining industry are preserved.”

Rex Lynch
Anderson County Mayor. Letter to OSM

In Anderson county the agriculture/mining group is less than 0.7% of the county economy, while the Arts, entertainment and recreation is over 6.6% of the local economy–thats over 6 times the employment generated by this short term industry.12 Mining employed 231 people in Anderson county in 1990. If the experience of West Virginia and Kentucky repeats itself in Tennessee this number can be expected to DROP in Anderson, as well as Claiborne, Scott and Campbell counties as the strip mining accelerates.

Conclusion

The ultimate cost to both the state of Tennessee and the counties most impacted by destructive surface mining, is more than the short term loss of jobs, and the unsightly clearcutting and blasting that tourists are now seeing from planes as they fly into our state.

Additional cost include damage to roads from coal trucks, destruction of the natural beauty which attracts retirement communities and predictable detrimental effect that blowing up mountains and streams has on tourism. And when an industry that isn’t even in the top 10 starts eroding the number one employer in a state its time for people to take a serious look at the economic consequences of strip mining.

There are additional downstream costs such as water purification to remove sediment, loss of habitat where people hunt, and destruction of highland watersheds; these details need to be taken into account when looking at the true cost of strip mining. When you look beneath the surface of strip mining it is not only destructive environmentally– but it has a destructive impact on the hard nosed economics of the counties it strips. The coal companies may help a school out for PR–but beneath that there is a true cost, in jobs and dollars and cents, that the strippers are hoping Tennessee doesn’t wake up to.

Loggers use a primitive kind of pull

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006 - posted by Appalachian Voices

[Kentucky] Some timber-cutters in Kentucky are reviving an environmentally friendly practice that traces to the state’s frontier days. “Horse-loggers,” as they are often called, are using draft horses and mules to snake logs from the forest. The practice can lessen the damage to many immature trees and other woodland plants that might be crushed by skid loaders and bulldozers. While animals alone could not feasibly handle the volume of timber harvested in Kentucky, foresters note that some sites are particularly well-suited for horse or mule logging. Especially in woodlands where choice logs are too scattered to make the use of heavy equipment profitable, or where other plant species need special protection.

News notes are courtesy of Southern Forests Network News Notes
www.southernsustainableforests.org

Big Coal: The Dirty Secret Behind America’s Energy Future (by Jeff Goodell)

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006 - posted by jw

Jeff Goodell’s Big Coal: The Dirty Secret Behind America’s Energy Future has been making quite a splash nationwide. Corey S. Powell just gave it a rave review over at the little ol’ New York Times.

Folks interested can also read the first chapter of Big Coal, excerpted here

One of the triumphs of modern life is our ability to distance ourselves from the simple facts of our own existence. We love our hamburgers, but we’ve never seen the inside of a slaughterhouse. We’re not sure if the asparagus that accompanies our salmon is grown in Ecuador or Oregon. We flush the toilet and don’t want to know any more. If we feel bad, we take a pill. We don’t even bury our own dead-they are carted away and buried or burned for us.

It’s easy to forget what a luxury this is-until you visit a place like China. Despite its booming economy in recent years, the insulating walls of modern life have not yet been fully erected there. In restaurants, the entrÈes are often alive in a cage in the dining room. Herbs and acupuncture needles inspire more faith than pharmaceutical drugs. Toilets stink. In rural areas, running water is a surprise, hot water a thrill. When you flip the switch on the wall and the light goes on, you know exactly what it costs-all you have to do is take a deep breath and feel the burn of coal smoke in your lungs.

To a westerner, nothing is more uncivilized than the sulfury smell of coal. You can’t take a whiff without thinking of labor battles and underground mine explosions, of chugging smokestacks and black lung.

But coal is everywhere in twenty-first-century China. It’s piled up on sidewalks, pressed into bricks and stacked near the back doors of homes, stockpiled into small mountains in the middle of open fields, and carted around behind bicycles and old wheezing locomotives. Plumes of coal smoke rise from rusty stacks on every urban horizon. There is soot on every windowsill and around the collar of every white shirt. Coal is what’s fueling China’s economic boom, and nobody makes any pretense that it isn’t. And as it did in America one hundred years ago, the power of coal will lift China into a better world. It will make the country richer, more civilized, and more remote from the hard facts of life, just like us.

The cost of the rough journey China is undertaking is obvious. More than six thousand workers a year are killed in China’s coal mines. The World Health Organization estimates that in East Asia, a region made up predominantly of China and South Korea, 355,000 people a year die from the effects of urban outdoor air pollution. The first time I visited Jiamusi, a city in China’s industrial north, it was so befouled by coal smoke that I could hardly see across the street. All over China, limestone buildings are dissolving in the acidic air. In Beijing, the ancient outdoor statuary at a 700-year-old Taoist temple I visited was encased in Plexiglas to protect it. And it’s not just the Chinese who are paying for their coal-fired prosperity. Pollution from China’s power plants blows across the Pacific and is inhaled by sunbathers on Malibu beach. Toxic mercury from Chinese coal finds its way into polar bears in the Arctic. Most seriously, the carbon dioxide released by China’s mad burning of coal is helping to destabilize the climate of the entire planet.

All this would be much easier to condemn if the West had not done exactly the same thing during its headlong rush to become rich and prosperous. In fact, we’re still doing it. Although America is a vastly richer country with many more options available to us, our per capita consumption of coal is three times higher than China’s. You can argue that we manage it better-our mines are safer, our power plants are cleaner-but mostly we just hide it better. We hide it so well, in fact, that many Americans think that coal went out with corsets and top hats. Most of us have no idea how central coal is to our everyday lives or what our relationship with this black rock really costs us.

In truth, the United States is more dependent on coal today than ever before. The average American consumes about twenty pounds of it a day. We don’t use it to warm our hearths anymore, but we burn it by wire whenever we flip on the light switch or charge up our laptops. More than one hundred years after Thomas Edison connected the first light bulb to a coal-fired generator, coal remains the bedrock of the electric power industry in America. About half the electricity we consume comes from coal-we burn more than a billion tons of it a year, usually in big, aging power plants that churn out amazing quantities of power, profit, and pollution. In fact, electric power generation is one of the largest and most capital-intensive industries in the country, with revenues of more than $260 billion in 2004. And the rise of the Internet-a global network of electrons-has only increased the industry’s power and influence. We may not like to admit it, but our shiny white iPod economy is propped up by dirty black rocks.

This was not how things were supposed to go in America. Coal was supposed to be the engine of the industrial revolution, not the Internet revolution. It once powered our steamships and trains; it forged the steel that won the wars and shaped our cars and skyscrapers and airplanes. It kept pioneers warm on the prairie and built fortunes for robber barons such as Henry Frick and Andrew Carnegie. Without coal, the world as we know it today would be impossible to imagine. There should be monuments to coal in every big city, giant statues of Pennsylvania anthracite and West Virginia bituminous. It is literally the rock that built America.

But we’ve been hooked on coal for almost 150 years now, and like a Bowery junkie, we keep telling ourselves it’s time to come clean, without ever actually doing it. We stopped burning coal in our homes in the 1930s, in locomotives in the 1940s, and by the 1950s it seemed that coal was on its way out for electricity generation, too. Nuclear power was the great dream of the post-World War II era, but the near-meltdown of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in 1979 put an end to that. Then natural gas overtook coal as the fuel of choice. If coal was our industrial smack, natural gas was our methadone: it was clean, easy to transport, and nearly as cheap as coal. Virtually every power plant built in America between 1975 and 2002 was gas-fired. Almost everybody in the energy world presumed that the natural gas era would soon give way to even cleaner sources of power generation-wind, solar, biofuels, hydrogen, perhaps someday solar panels on the moon. As for the old coal plants, they would be dismantled, repowered, or left to rust in the fields.

But like many revolutions, this one hasn’t progressed quite as planned.

Energy-wise, the fundamental problem in the world today is that the earth’s reserves of fossil fuels are finite but our appetite for them is not. The issue is not simply that there are more people in the world, consuming more fossil fuels, but that as economies grow and people in developing nations are lifted out of poverty, they buy cars and refrigerators and develop an appetite for gas, oil, and coal. Between 1950 and 2000, as the world population grew by roughly 140 percent, fossil fuel consumption increased by almost 400 percent. By 2030, the world’s demand for energy is projected to more than double, with most of that energy coming from fossil fuels.

Of course, every barrel of oil we pump out of the ground, every cubic foot of natural gas we consume, and every ton of coal we burn further depletes reserves. For a while, our day of reckoning was put off by the fact that technological innovation outpaced consumption: the more fossil fuels we burned, the better we became at finding more, lulling us into a false belief that the world’s reserves of fossil fuels are eternal. But that delusion can’t last forever. In fact, there are increasing signs that it won’t last much longer.

Oil is the most critical fossil fuel for modern economies, underlying everything from transportation to manufacturing. In 2004, the world consumed about 80 million barrels of oil each day, about 30 percent of which came from the Middle East. The world is not going to run out of oil anytime soon, but it might run out of cheap, easy-to-get oil. As that happens, prices are likely to spike, fundamentally disrupting major parts of the world’s economy. You don’t have to buy into the apocalyptic scenarios that some doomsayers predict – the collapse of industrial society, widespread famine – to see that the end of cheap oil is going to inspire panic and economic chaos as the world scrambles to find a replacement energy source.

The situation with natural gas is not much better. In the United States, consumption of natural gas, which is mostly used for home heating and the manufacture of industrial products, as well as agricultural fertilizers and chemicals, has jumped by about 40 percent in the past two decades. About 85 percent of that gas came from domestic sources, but production in the United States has been flat for several decades, leading us to import more and more from Canada, where production is also beginning to peak. There are still substantial reserves in places such as Russia and Qatar, but the global shipping and trading infrastructure is woefully undeveloped. Upgrading it will cost billions of dollars and take decades to complete. Not surprisingly, natural gas prices have tripled in the past few years and caused home heating bills to rise rapidly in many regions of the country.

What about the other alternatives? Nuclear power can be used to generate electricity, but no new plants have been built in America in thirty years. This is primarily because nuclear plants are still haunted by the ghosts of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, as well as unresolved problems of radioactive waste. Even if the social and environmental hurdles could be overcome, nuclear plants are so expensive to build that a major resurgence is unlikely. And as much as we would all like to imagine we could live in a world powered by solar panels and wind turbines, these alternative energy sources are not yet capable of powering our high-tech economy.

Out of this, coal has emerged as the default fuel of choice. Coal has a number of virtues as a fuel: it can be shipped via boats and railroads, it’s easy to store, and it’s easy to burn. But coal’s main advantage over other fuels is that it’s cheap and plentiful. There are an estimated 1 trillion tons of recoverable coal in the world, by far the largest reserve of fossil fuel left on the planet. And despite a run-up in coal prices in 2004 and 2005, coal is still inexpensive compared to other fuels. In a world starved for energy, the importance of this simple fact cannot be underestimated: the world needs cheap power, and coal can provide it.

America is literally built upon thick seams of coal. Just as Saudi Arabia dominates the global oil market because of the geological good luck of having more than 20 percent of the world’s oil reserves, the United States is a big advocate for coal because it has the geological good luck of having more than 25 percent of the world’s recoverable coal reserves-about 270 billion tons-buried within its borders. As coal industry executives never tire of pointing out, this is enough coal to fuel America at the current rate of consumption for about 250 years. To put the size of its bounty into perspective, consider this: all of western Europe has only 36 billion tons of recoverable coal. China has less than half as much as the United States-126 billion tons. India and Australia, both big coal burners, have even less than China. The only country with reserves that come close to America’s is Russia, with 176 billion tons, but much of that coal is in remote regions and difficult to mine. Not surprisingly, coal boosters often refer to America as “the Saudi Arabia of coal.”

America’s great bounty of coal confers upon the United States many economic and political advantages. As a purely practical matter, it means that America will not go dark while scientists search for a replacement for fossil fuels. If the world becomes energy-starved, our reserves mean that America will have a source of fuel to keep our factories running and our cities well lit. If oil supplies collapse and prices skyrocket, we can begin a crash program to build coal liquefaction plants, which can turn coal into synthetic diesel. It won’t keep our SUVs rolling, but it might help keep our F-16s flying. Using a similar process, coal can also be transformed into synthetic natural gas, fertilizers, and a variety of industrial chemicals.

But this great bounty of coal is also a great liability. It means that America has a big incentive to drag out the inevitable transition to cleaner, more modern forms of energy generation. In a world that is moving toward energy efficiency, coal is a big loser. Alternative energy guru Amory Lovins estimates that by the time you mine the coal, haul it to the power plant, burn it, and then send the electricity out over the wires to the incandescent bulb in your home, only about 3 percent of the energy contained in a ton of coal is transformed into light. In fact, just the energy wasted by coal plants in America would be enough to power the entire Japanese economy. In effect, America’s vast reserve of coal is like a giant carbon anchor slowing down the nation’s transition to new sources of energy. And because coal is the dirtiest and most carbon-intensive of all fossil fuels-coal plants are responsible for nearly 40 percent of U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas-a commitment to coal is tantamount to a denial of a whole host of environmental and public health issues, including global warming. When you’re sitting on top of 250 years’ worth of coal, an international agreement to limit carbon dioxide emissions, such as the Kyoto Protocol, is easily seen as a crude attempt by jealous competitors to blunt one of America’s great strategic and economic advantages.

In America, the story of coal’s emergence as the default fuel of choice is inextricably tied up with corruption, politics, and war. California’s long, torturous “energy crisis,” which lasted through the summer of 2000 and culminated in rolling blackouts in January 2001, underscored the need for new investment in electricity generation and transmission. The collapse of Big Coal’s arch-nemesis, Enron, also helped coal regain some of its luster. Once heralded as a great modernizing force in the electric power industry, promising to bring a market-driven revolution to the old energy empire, Enron turned out to be a den of thieves. The company’s fall-one of the largest bankruptcies in U.S. history-helped throw the natural gas market into turmoil, sending prices skyrocketing and making coal so inexpensive in comparison that operating a coal plant became, as one industry consultant explained it to me, “like running a legal mint.”

The 2000 presidential election was another turning point. Democratic candidate Al Gore was one of the first American politicians to take global warming seriously, and anyone who takes global warming seriously is not a friend of Big Coal. Coal industry executives knew that if Gore was elected, regulations to limit or tax carbon dioxide emissions wouldn’t be far behind. So Big Coal threw its money and muscle behind George W. Bush, helping him gain a decisive edge in key industrial states, including West Virginia, a Democratic stronghold that had not voted for a Republican presidential candidate in seventy-five years. After the disputed Florida recount, West Virginia’s five electoral votes provided the margin that Bush needed to take his seat in the Oval Office.

President Bush made good on his debt. Within weeks of taking the oath of office, Bush began staffing regulatory agencies with former coal industry executives and lobbyists. Not surprisingly, Big Coal also played a prominent role in Vice President Dick Cheney’s National Energy Policy Development Group, which was charged with crafting a new energy policy. The task force’s recommendations were unabashedly coal-friendly, including a call for up to 1,900 new power plants over the next twenty years; a $2 billion, ten-year subsidy for “clean coal” technology; and a recommendation that the Department of Justice “review” enforcement actions against dirty coal burners.
Finally, the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, was an unexpected boon for Big Coal. Politically, it took the spotlight off many of the Bush administration’s controversial coal-friendly energy policies, which were just beginning to make headlines. More important, 9/11 changed the tone of the debate about energy in America, making many of us reconsider the high cost of our dependence on oil from the Middle East. In our globally connected world, “energy independence” is more of a political slogan than a practical reality. But as long as American soldiers were dying in the oil-rich Middle East, it seemed downright unpatriotic to oppose coal. . . .

The Ballad of Blankey Crackett

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006 - posted by jw

THE BALLAD OF BLANKEY CRACKETT
Words by P. J. Laska
to the tune of “The Ballad of Davey Crockett”

Born on a mountaintop removed by greed
Sorriest sight in the land of the freed.
Raised in destruction, that’s all he knows.
Tears up the land wherever he goes.
Blankey, Blankey Crackett
King of the Coal Frontier.

Fought single-handed in a coal country war,
Till the Union was busted and the miners made poor.
Got a big promotion for what he done.
Went to Company president from hired gun.
Blankey, Blankey Crackett
Company man of the year.

Throws a big party to help his career
Treats 40,000 people to pop and beer.
He tosses them a crumb, he throws them a bone.
Little do they know it’s only a loan.
(with interest, that is, compounded daily!)
Blankey, Blankey Crackett,
The money man’s peer.

Heard there was some mountains that hadn’t been porked.
Protected by a justice of the Supreme Court.
Blankey went to work, spreading money around.
Bought him a flunky to rule up is down.
(Money talks, buys votes, just run some ads!)
Blankey, Blankey Crackett,
The man for all torts.

It was all for the children, Blankey swore.
You can’t be too careful, there’s predators galore.
Regulate people and leave businesses alone.
That’s how we make the world our home.
(if you live somewhere else, that is!)
Blankey, Blankey Crackett,
A leader in the race for more.

When he built a big sludge dam next to a school,
Some people wondered if he had lost his cool.
Blankey answered back that he was the king
and what mattered to him was to do the right thing!
(for big bucks, that is. if you’re worried about
two billion gallons of toxic waste, move the school!)
Blankey, Blankey Crackett
King of the Coal Frontier.

Massey Operations Cited Twice for Flooding and Mudslides

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006 - posted by jw

(Now say that five times fast…we don’t get to say it that often! Masseyoperationstwicecitedformuddingandfloodslides!)

Coal operations managed by Massey Energy and International Coal Group (ICG) are being blamed for mudslides this week as the mid-Atlantic states face torrential rains.
Near Ethel, WV, State Rt. 17 was blocked completely… and the WV Department of Environmental protection is citing Massey Energy operative “Aracoma Coal.”

WSAZ, News Channel 3, has the video…

Christina Smith tells her horrifying story, “The whole trailer started shaking! You should have heard it! The whole hillside hit the road!”

Whole trees were ripped from the bank behind her house, tearing through the garden, rosebushes, and yard of Mrs. Smith. She was lucky enough to escape.

In Mingo County, another Massey operative – Delbarton Mining – was again cited and ordered to stop work that caused a blackwater spill at Pigeon Creek, further discoloring the creek.

IGC, at fault for a sediment pond overflow into the Birch River, was ordered to stop work in Nicholas County.
Before the washout occurred, crews were nearing completion of reclaiming a valley fill between Boggs and Big Ditch Lake.

Lalena Price, spokesperson with the Department of Environmental Protection, says an imminent harm cessation order has been issued to IGC.

Rain over the mid-Atlantic states is expected to continue due to Atlantic moisture being swept inland by a disturbance that has swirled from the Bahamas into Florida and Georgia plus a stalled front over the Appalachians.

Unfortunately, the weather is being much more unpredictable than the ever negligent coal-companies of Appalachia. Whats it gonna take?

Appalachia: National Sacrifice Zone

Tuesday, June 27th, 2006 - posted by jw

Jeff Goodell, author of Big Coal: The Dirty Secret Behind America’s Energy Future, just wrote a terrific editorial in the New York Times called Our Black Future, which touches on the growing need and want of coal in supplying America energy.

Now that the need for greater energy independence has become a universal political slogan, every county commissioner in America has an idea of how we can break free of our Middle Eastern oil shackles: ethanol, hydrogen, solar panels on the roof of every Hummer! Still, it’s hard not to be optimistic when you’re standing in front of a 70-foot seam of coal. It’s not hype; it’s real. Is the bridge to energy independence paved in black?

One danger is that now, with the increasing price of oil and natural gas, many forward thinking power-players are looking to a new method of coal production called “coal-to-liquid” production.

Firstly, we are switching burning one fossil fuel to burning another. Every second grader in the country now knows that burning fossil fuels is awful for human health and the environment. If we are going to be making large scale investments in energy infrastructure, it needs to be in renewables, and it ESPECIALLY doesn’t need to be in coal.

From 1984 to 2004, the average coal miner’s per-shift productivity more than doubled, while wages declined by 20 percent (adjusted for inflation). If we simply increase consumption, we will be condemning large areas of the country, including eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia, to national sacrifice zones.

Add that phrase to the mountaintop removal vernacular – NATIONAL SACRIFICE ZONE.

Goodell points out that in WWII, Nazis worked feverishly to try and find a way to power their tanks with coal (doesn’t that make it a bad idea by default?)

One of the worst parts about coal-to-liquid is that it uses three barrels of water for every one barrel of fuel it produces. In South Africa, a company called Sasol produces around 150,000 barrells of diesel from coal every day. That means that they also use 450,000 barrels of fresh water on a continent where people die of thirst every day.

Governors such as Montana’a Brian Schweitzer are putting their considerable political capital behind selling the coal-to-liquid technology to the middle of the road and more progressive folks around the country.

Coal will play a part in our energy equation, probably for quire a long time. And that’s OK. But we do not need to beinvesting more and more in coal. Every time they say “clean coal,” remember that this is what coal looks like…

I’ll let Goodell wrap it up. He does it well…

The biggest problem with our bounty of coal is not what it does to our mountains or the atmosphere, but what it does to our minds. It preserves the illusion that we don’t have to change our lives. Given the profound challenges we face with the end of cheap oil and the arrival of global warming, this is a dangerous fantasy.
If we had less coal, we might replace the 19th-century notion that we can drill and burn our way to prosperity with a more modern view of efficiency and sustainability. Instead of spending billions of dollars each year to subsidize tapping out yet another finite resource, we’d pour that money into solar energy, biofuels and other renewable resources.
We’d be creating jobs in new industries, not protecting them in old ones. And we’d understand that the real fuel of the future is not coal but creativity.