Violation-riddled MVP developer submits request to alter Southgate pipeline

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
February 3, 2025

CONTACT
Dan Radmacher, Media Specialist, (540) 798-6683, dan@appvoices.org 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, pipeline operator Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC submitted a new amendment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for the methane gas pipeline “Southgate,” proposed for Virginia and North Carolina. Southgate would extend the controversial Mountain Valley Pipeline, and has faced significant opposition since it was proposed in 2018.

MVP made an amendment request instead of a new application and asked that FERC issue an order by December 31, 2025. Project opponents contend a new application should be required because the route and impact of the project are distinct from the original 2020 Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity issued by FERC.

Just 10 days after receiving a three-year extension on their federal certificate, MVP announced it had radically altered its plans for Southgate, changing the route, length and pipe diameter. As described in the amendment, Southgate would include 31 miles of 30-inch diameter pipeline in Virginia and North Carolina and had “entered into precedent agreements with Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (‘Duke’) and Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc, d/b/a Enbridge Gas North Carolina (‘PSNC’), both as Foundation Shippers.” The similarly routed proposed Southeast Supply Enhancement Project from Williams Companies’ expansion of the Transco pipelines also claims Duke will be a major customer. The co-location of two high-pressure, large diameter pipelines is of significant concern for local residents.

MVP’s amendment request will trigger a public comment period.

“This new project proposed by Southgate developers, shielded in a FERC amendment, is unnecessary and dangerous to the communities, air, water and species along its intended route,” said Jessica Sims, Virginia Field Coordinator at Appalachian Voices. “We’ve seen the abject misery that Southgate’s developers inflicted with their Mountain Valley Pipeline, and that history should not be repeated—FERC should deny this amendment.

“For years MVP Southgate has never moved forward and has been denied multiple permits,” said Dr. Crystal Cavalier-Keck, Co-Founder of 7 Directions of Service. “As a result, developers have abandoned their original plans, and proposed what can only be considered a totally new project. The route has been cut in half and the size of the pipe has increased significantly. Meanwhile, an additional high-pressure methane gas pipeline has just been proposed to run directly alongside it. Our regulators must reject Southgate’s attempts to downplay these developments as minor, and ensure the project follows procedures from square one, where community concerns can be fully heard.”

“When constructing the Mainline, Mountain Valley Pipeline consistently disregarded community concerns and environmental safeguards,” said Caroline Hansley, Campaign Organizing Strategist with the Sierra Club. “Now the company’s new proposal for the MVP-Southgate extension is drastically different from its original proposal, and FERC should treat it as such. A new application is the only way  to ensure transparency, accountability, and a meaningful opportunity for impacted communities to have their voices heard. We cannot allow yet another harmful pipeline to jeopardize our environment, public health, and climate progress.”

“Mountain Valley Pipeline has spent decades trying to break and bend the rules to rush through unnecessary, dangerous methane gas pipelines that put communities and vulnerable ecosystems at risk,” said Victoria Higgins, Virginia Director for Chesapeake Climate Action Network. “It is incumbent upon regulators like FERC to ensure MVP Southgate is subject to the same rules as every other project and recognize the amendment for what it is: a completely new proposal.”