Front Porch Blog
Attacks on the EPA escalate, and rate freezes don’t consider customers.
Virginia’s legislative session may be brief, but many bills with major implications for our future energy mix have already been acted on. Two weeks into this year’s session, here is a look at where our top issues stand.
Rate freeze controversy heats up
It’s been in the news around the state: Dominion Power has enlisted the help of utility-friendly legislators, in particular Senator Frank Wagner of Virginia Beach, in an effort to pause regulators’ scrutiny of the utility’s revenue for eight years.
The legislative patron says his bill is necessary to keep customers from seeing rising energy costs due to the mythical high price of compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s carbon pollution standard. Attorney General Mark Herring, who is tasked with looking out for ratepayers, notes that the measure would actually prevent rebates of overcharges to customers.
Anyone familiar with the system in which Virginia’s investor-owned electric providers operate will be struck by the way this would remove State Corporation Commission oversight and, with it, Dominion’s accountability to customers. In another troubling wrinkle, if cost-effective clean energy resources such as energy efficiency are deployed over this time resulting in saved energy and Dominion over-earns on its rate of return then customers are deprived of the those savings. Despite opposition from many sides, the bill has passed out of subcommittee.
Attacks on Virginia potential to achieve large-scale carbon-free power
For reasons ranging from pure political grandstanding to reactions to a perceived federal overreach in state affairs, many legislators are taking part in the rush to apply tactics pioneered by the American Legislative Exchange Council and Americans for Prosperity to stymie the implementation of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan in Virginia. One strategy is to interrupt what would be a smooth process of the Department of Environmental Quality preparing and sending Virginia’s implementation plan to the EPA. Legislation of this type gives the General Assembly a middle-man role able to approve the plan, which effectively obstructs the process and robs the executive branch of its control.
Other ways of slowing or stopping the EPA’s efforts to limit carbon pollution and drive investment in clean energy are plentiful: from Senator Wagner’s proposition prohibiting action in response to the standards until 18 criticisms of the standards are rectified, studying whether the plan on the whole benefits Virginia at all before taking action, or giving the General Assembly power to do what the Attorney General has not done: sue the EPA on behalf of Virginia.
Common-sense steps to make solar accessible and affordable for more Virginians
The main piece of legislation we’ve watched that would put an end to indiscriminate carbon pollution and lead to investments in clean energy and climate adaptation is the Virginia Coastal Protection Act. The bill did not manage to get the support it needed this year to make it out of committee.
Still, as we fight the bad bills above, we have a chance to make progress on several clean energy bills that will make a real difference to bring more renewable energy online in Virginia. Several will be heard in the House Energy Subcommittee on Tuesday, Feb. 3, be there to support solutions like community solar, larger net metering, and more!
PREVIOUS
NEXT
Related News
Leave a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Update: on the SB 1349 base rate freeze legislation, our community’s level of concern spiked early this week when the bill was amended to include Appalachian Power – however, members of the legislature who champion clean energy stepped in just in last couple days to ensure some significant changes were made to the bill: it did pass the Senate today, but in a very very different version. These improvements should help to mitigate the expected customer bill impacts and represent modest commitments to renewables.
As we understand the changes, provisions were inserted to authorize up to 600 MW of utility solar (which will sound familiar to anyone who read the news of Dominion’s announcement this week) and to require new efficiency programs be funded through utilities base rates. And some language in bill that associated the threat of escalating electricity rates with EPA action was actually stripped out as well! Stay tuned for more legislative wrap-up after the procedural cross-over day February 11th when the fate of more bills is known.
Thanks for posting this information !