Front Porch Blog

Wins and losses come as the fight against the Mountain Valley Pipeline continues

A key air permit was denied and then a key water permit was approved, but many hurdles to the pipeline remain

This blog is co-authored by Ridge Graham and Jessica Sims, Appalachian Voices’ North Carolina Field Coordinator and Virginia Field Coordinator, respectively.

Key upcoming dates

WV DEP 401 decision: Due by Dec 31, 2021
U.S. Army Corps 404 decision: January 2022
Fourth Circuit cases, FERC amendment vote: likely Q1 2022

On Dec. 3 — after more than eight hours of public, industry and agency comments spread over two days — six of the seven members of the state Air Pollution Control Board voted to deny the air permit for the Lambert Compressor Station.

Despite presentations from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and representatives from Mountain Valley Pipeline that argued for approval of the project, the board was ultimately swayed by overwhelming recommendations from locally impacted landowners, advocates, health officials and attorneys who spoke against the compressor station.

The facility would have been the sole compressor station for the Southgate Extension of the Mountain Valley Pipeline and would have emitted particulate matter and other hazardous air pollutants that are unsafe for human health at any exposure level.

The site proposed for the facility was near two existing compressor stations that have polluted rural, environmental justice communities in the eastern half of Pittsylvania County for nearly six decades.

Pipeline opponents celebrate after the Air Pollution Control Board denied a permit for the Lambert Compressor Station. Photo courtesy of Caroline Hansley, Sierra Club

This victory was a culmination of years of effort by Appalachian Voices, impacted landowners, the Pittsylvania County NAACP and many of our partners across West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina who have fought against the Southgate extension since it was announced in 2016.

The focus of the board’s findings that led to the decision to deny the permit, as well as members’ questions toward DEQ and other commenters throughout the two-day hearing, was on environmental justice and cumulative impacts from the existing compressor stations, including the toxicity of particulate matter that would be emitted from the facility. Appalachian Voices’ comments on these aspects submitted to DEQ earlier this year were featured heavily in the comments delivered by other speakers during the proceedings.

The authority for the board to deny the permit in order to prevent disproportionate impact on environmental justice communities was a direct result of all of the hard work fighting against the Buckingham compressor station for the cancelled Atlantic Coast Pipeline by the Union Hill community.

DEQ failed to consider environmental justice impacts in its recommendation to approve the Buckingham station and downplayed these same concerns during the Lambert hearing.

Although there are still lingering issues with eminent domain and the threat of the pipeline remains, this was a major blow to the viability of the Southgate extension, and could potentially spell trouble for other gas-fired compressor stations across the country and the Mountain Valley Pipeline as a whole.

Violation Vigil

Dr. Rev. William Barber II speaks

Dr. Rev. William Barber II gave a powerful speech at the Violation Vigil. Photo by Will Kerner Photography

On Saturday, Dec. 11 in Richmond, Virginia, a special collaborative event opposing the Mountain Valley Pipeline called the “Violation Vigil” was held. The incredible event brought hundreds of people to a large outdoor amphitheater and featured a powerful slate of musicians and speakers, including the Dr. Rev. William Barber II of the Poor People’s Campaign and Del. Sam Rasoul.

The gathering was the brainchild of the creative force behind ARTivism Virginia, a Charlottesville-based advocacy organization. The imaginative use of visual language and art has long been a gift ARTivism Virginia has brought to multiple fossil fuel fights.

For this project, they proposed an artistic and deeply meaningful idea to partners across the state to reflect on the years of harm the Mountain Valley Pipeline has wrought on Southwest Virginia. Appalachian Voices was proud to support the event, helping with planning, participant and sign coordination, and media outreach. The Violation Vigil featured collaboration of over 10 organizations.

Violation Vigil

Pipeline opponents at the Violation Vigil wore signs representing each of the more than 300 water quality violations. Photo by Will Kerner Photography

Using signs that represented the hundreds of violations MVP has committed and for which they were sued, the project and event helped connect people across the commonwealth. Participants received one of the 300-plus signs with striking graphics and learned about the violation represented on their specific sign.

The event reclaimed the regulatory language of the violations, stating there was “no reasonable assurance” that MVP could maintain water quality standards. The hundreds of signs displayed at the event showed the magnitude of abuses committed by MVP, and participants were invited to share specific details about the violation and waterway they represented on stage.

The vigil gave an opportunity for our voices, united in opposition to the project, to be heard, in direct contrast to the Dec. 14 State Water Control Board meeting, where the DEQ officially prohibited any public comment on the MVP. The vigil crowd heard inspiring speeches from Rev. William Barber, who said of the Mountain Valley Pipeline “This is sin, and we’ve got to call out sin.”

Rasoul, Jason Crazy Bear Keck, Emily Satterwhite, David Sligh and Sonya Taylor shared inspiring words with the crowd, and Yara Allen, Joe Troop, the SUNSiNG Collective and members of After Jack, and NO BS Brass Band energized the attendees with powerful music.

The moving event was emceed by Russell Chisholm, Co-Chair of the POWHR Coalition, and Kay Ferguson, Co-Director of ARTivism. ARTivism prepared this video of the day, and the full livestream can be viewed here.

State Water Control Board meeting

That spirit of unity was carried into the State Water Control Board meeting, held on Tuesday, Dec. 14 in Richmond, where opponents gathered before the meeting, carrying a banner that read: “It’s time to choose our future.” The meeting included deliberation of the U.S. Clean Water Act 401 permit for the pipeline.

Protesters outside the State Water Control Board meeting urged the board to deny the pipeline’s permit. Photo by Jessica Sims

Although MVP’s 300-plus violations of water quality standards make it evident the company cannot construct this pipeline without harming water resources, the DEQ minimized the concerns of the over 2,000 individuals who submitted comments in opposition in their staff presentation at the meeting.

A recent report from Wild Virginia places the actual number of violations at three times that amount. As reflected in the submission from Appalachian Voices and over 900 of our members and supporters during the public comment period, the application had insufficient data and provided no assurance construction will comply with state water quality standards.

DEQ used procedural privilege to prohibit public engagement and forbid commenters the chance to respond to misleading materials prepared for board members.

Water Control Board meeting

DEQ staff presented information to the Water Control Board. Photo by Jessica Sims

During the proceedings, DEQ staff were unable to directly answer questions from board members about environmental justice analysis and sufficient LEDPA (Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative) data. Within the summary response to comments, DEQ staff insulted the public by mischaracterizing valid concerns.

Alarmingly, DEQ’s water permitting director claimed there were no “fenceline communities,” or communities directly adjacent to or impacted by the project. Certainly, anyone living in a blast zone, or whose private drinking water source or well has been impacted by construction is in a fenceline community. DEQ’s mischaracterization of the negative impacts from the Mountain Valley Pipeline showed their propensity to regulate harm, rather than prevent it.

Ultimately, three of the five board members present granted new permission for Mountain Valley Pipeline to pollute and continue harming the communities of Southwest Virginia. (Board members Paula Jasinski and Ryan Seiger dissented. Board Chair Heather Wood, and member Jillian Cohen were absent).

Although this outcome is deeply disappointing, Mountain Valley Pipeline continues to face a volatile and uncertain future. Having lost a key authorization for the Southgate extension, the project may need to pursue a new compressor station along the mainline route, adding more delay and scrutiny to the proceedings.

MVP also faces many regulatory and legal roadblocks. The ruinous pipeline is missing a 401 authorization from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, a 404 authorization from the U.S. Army Corps, and awaits decisions from the Fourth Circuit Court regarding the U.S. Forest Service case concerning Jefferson National Forest and the Fish & Wildlife Service case concerning the Endangered Species Act.

Additionally, MVP’s request to bore under waterways in West Virginia and Virginia has gone unanswered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

We are deeply thankful for everyone who continues to support the communities impacted by this extractive, harmful fossil fuel project. Appalachian Voices remains in solidarity with those impacted by Mountain Valley Pipeline, and we will continue to fight until the project is canceled.


  1. Ji Montgomery says:

    I am demanding against drilling into mvp

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube