Follow Us on Twitter: Appalachian Voices | iLoveMountains.org

Archive for October, 2006

Defenders of Wildlife

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006 - posted by jw

Wanted to recognize DoW’s “Conseravtion Heroes” for 2006, which Anita posted on below

• Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (NY-23)
• Sen. Maria Cantwell (WA)
• Sen. Lincoln Chafee (RI)
• Rep. John Dingell (MI-15)
• Rep. Raul Grijalva (AZ-07)
• Sen. Jim Jeffords (VT)
• Rep. Ed Markey (MA-07)
• Rep. George Miller (CA-07)
• Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03)
• Sen. Harry Reid (NV)
• Rep. Jim Saxton (NJ-03)
• Rep. Tom Udall (NM-03)

Wildlife Conservation Report Card

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006 - posted by Appalachian Voices

The Conservation Report Card measures the commitment of U.S. Senators and Representatives to wildlife and habitat conservation during each Congressional session. It reviews both House and Senate votes on key conservation issues, providing a clear assessment of how well members of Congress are doing to protect wildlife and wild lands for future generations. The Report Card is an important resource constituents can use to examine their elected representatives ‘ efforts to conserve our nation ‘ s natural heritage for our children and grandchildren. Find out how your Senators and Representative have voted on conservation issues this year.

News notes are courtesy of Southern Forests Network News Notes
www.southernsustainableforests.org

For the Last Time…

Monday, October 30th, 2006 - posted by jw

Im so sick and tired of seeing this

West Virginia’s coal industry must strike a balance between maintaining jobs and taking care of the environment, but just how to do that is not clear.

A panel of experts on Tuesday discussed the hard reality of trying to preserve coal mining jobs while also preserving the environment.

LOOK!

I see two patterns in this picture.
One is the fairly consistent amount of coal over time.
The other is continually devastating job losses.

100s of people are employed by a deep mine. MTR sites can employ as little as 9.
Mountaintop removal causes job loss. Period. End of story.

From Open Spaces to Wild Places: the Economic Value of Habitat Protection to Your Community

Monday, October 30th, 2006 - posted by Appalachian Voices

The Southeast Watershed Forum ‘ s 24-page report details the many varieties habitats and natural systems and their importance to our region. All of this is illustrated through several inspirational case studies of how individuals in the Southeast have been able to enhance growth and development in their community while conserving resources and protecting habitat. This publication is a valuable resource on a local or regional scale for anyone, including watershed groups, local officials, planning agencies, resource agencies and land trusts, who is concerned with land-use practices and development policies in the Southeast.

News notes are courtesy of Southern Forests Network News Notes
www.southernsustainableforests.org

Who Runs Appalachian Republicans?

Monday, October 30th, 2006 - posted by jw

Don Blankenship, CEO of Massey Energy.
Thats who.

Though he is not running for public office, Don Blankenship has become the dominant political figure this year in West Virginia.

The chief executive of Massey Energy, the fourth-largest coal producer in the country, has vowed to spend whatever it takes to wrestle control away from several Democratic incumbents in the West Virginia Legislature.

Blankenship is pouring millions of dollars to try and influence races in West Virginia – normally a Democratic/Labor stronghold – for the state GOP. Unike in 2005 when Blankenship beat Governor Manchin’s signature “bond sale issue,” Democrats are aggresively combating Blankenship, who is using a highly expensive, and highly sophisticated GOTV program for state legislative races – which are usually relatively low both in technology and expenses.

While it looks like coal barons might finally have perfected the permanent takeover of West Virginia by coal barons for coal barons, LazyHorse believes that the national picture looks much bleaker for coal this election season. Great stuff.

HUGE: NYT – “Taking On a Coal Mining Practice as a Matter of Faith”

Monday, October 30th, 2006 - posted by jw

In what may be a pivotal turning point in the effort to return integrity to America’s energy policy by ending mountaintop removal coal-mining – the New York Times has printed a must-read article called “Taking On a Coal Mining Practice as a Matter of Faith”

…From there, she could see what she loved about Appalachia and what it had lost, and she wanted her visitors to see it, too.

The old rounded peaks of the mountains encircled the ridge, dense with trees smudged red and gold. But in the middle of the peaks, several stood stripped bare and chopped up, a result of an increasingly common and controversial coal mining practice called mountaintop removal.

“Doesn’t it say in Scripture, ‘Who can weigh a mountain, measure a basket of earth?’ ” Ms. Chapman-Crane said, recalling descriptions of God’s omnipotence in Isaiah 40:12. “Well, only God can. But now, the coal companies seem to be able to do it, too.”

Ms. Chapman-Crane, her colleagues at the Mennonite Central Committee Appalachia and other Appalachian Christians are trying to halt mountaintop removal, and at the heart of their work, they say, is their faith.

We were lucky enough to work with Allen Johnson – who heads “Christians for the Mountains- at the MTR week in Washington in September. He is a fantastic man. Listen to him talk about what he is most passionate about as he urges religious people to take up mountaintop removal “as a spiritual issue.” You can see him online in Bill Moyer’s special Is God Green?

Mary Yoder, who had volunteered to come on the trip for her congregation, Columbus Mennonite Church in Columbus, Ohio, asked, “So this is the kind of place that gets blown up in mountaintop removal?” Mr. Chapman-Crane replied, “This is what would be lost, is lost, when they blast a mountaintop.

What does industry guy have to say?
The usual garbage, without looking at the 90% job losses they’ve already caused coalfield residents.

The coal industry asserts that mountaintop removal is a safer way to remove coal than sending miners underground and that without it, companies would have to close mines and lay off workers.

And the mines are closing because the coal is running out. The US Geological Survey says that there are AT MOST just 20 years of high quality coal left in the Appalachian Basin.

Ahh…the pure unfiltered joy of listening to a coal stooge trying to defend himself with words:

Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association, a coal lobbying group, said that by fighting mountaintop removal religious groups might find their priorities colliding.
“They find themselves in a difficult position,” Mr. Popovich said, “because they’re expressing support for those who purport to protect nature, and, at the same time, that activism carries implications for the human side of the natural equation. Human welfare depends on the rational exploitation of nature.”

If MTR is rational for human welfare, then I’m all for some welfare reform!! Who says that MTR is rational? NYT, thanks for letting Mr. Popovich open his mouth and insert his own foot. Its much easier than us having to do it for him.

I think that the following sentiment is vastly underappreciated in the United States at large.

But as in much of Appalachia, pastors and churchgoers here are reluctant to stir up trouble: many work for coal companies, or the people next to them in the pew do. Others believe stopping mountaintop removal would eliminate the few jobs that remain.

Hmm…who wants them to think that there will be fewer jobs and more trouble to mine responsible than to have their homes be bombed by coal companies? How about Darrell Claudill…who works for a what?

Mr. Caudill, 57, works for a coal company and believes in being a good steward of the earth.

Sure…never heard that one before? Will he at least try and be creative in getting out of this rat-trap?

“Why did God produce coal then and put it underground?” said Mr. Caudill, who attends a nondenominational evangelical church. “He produced things that we need on this earth. Without coal, you wouldn’t have the warmth and light you have right now.”

Unless we lit a fire.
Or built a windmill or a solar panel or used hydro-electricity or methane or put a few desperate coal junkies like Mr. Claudill on a giant mouse-wheel and let them run round and round in circles towards a dollar bill they would never get to.

I wonder if he thinks, since God produced the things that we need on this earth…that we should also protect the drinking water that coal poisons or the toxic air filled with coal dust that the children of Appalachia are forced to breathe.

My bet is no.

The end is devastating.

Late in the trip, the tour group drove Lucious Thompson, 63, a former coal miner, to the horseshoe of peaks above McRoberts, where he lives. The peaks have been leveled. The woods where he had hunted are gone. The new grass on the new plateaus barely clings to the soil, which means that McRoberts often floods now after hard rains, he said.
“I’ve been flooded three times since they started working on the mountaintop,” Mr. Thompson said.
He talked of neighbors whose house foundations had been cracked because of the daily blasting, of a pond lost to sludge and of respiratory ailments because of the coal dust flying from the coal trucks.
“The coal company says it’s God’s will,” he said. “Well, God ain’t ever run no bulldozer.”
People like Mr. Thompson and the woods and mountains of Appalachia seemed to make the point the tour’s organizers hoped for. After the tour, Ms. Yoder returned to Columbus to tell her congregation of about 200 what she had learned.
“My comment to the church was that I would do the tour with an open mind,” she said, “and my conclusion is there is no room for mountaintop removal in our country.”

The fact that we have made the weekend issue of the New York Times is a big step, because when Americans simply see and begin to comprehend the rape of their country that is going on with mountintop removal coal-mining, mountaintop removal coal-mining is going to stop pretty quickly.

Pardon the length, but if the subject of faith and environmentalism is particularly of interest to you, you might also enjoy “Green by the Grace of God” from the Roanoke Times and “Is God Green” – a fantastica PBS special with Bill Moyers.

Whats on My Mind?

Monday, October 30th, 2006 - posted by jw

Congress can and WILL end mountaintop removal coal-mining.

Memorize this number: 202-224-3121
Its the Congressional switchboard.
You can call it anytime of day and speak with the office of any member of the US government (House, Senate, President, Government Agency, Committees, etc.)

Learn to use it.

New Landowner Newsletter from SFN

Sunday, October 29th, 2006 - posted by Appalachian Voices

SFN has created a new monthly email newsletter as a means of providing landowners with easy access to practical information and resources for sustainable and community forestry. Each month Southern Forests & Communities will feature a different topic related to sustainable forestry, and provide landowners with the latest news on strategies for sustainable forest management, forest enterprises, and forest-based community development. We also want to create a forum for innovative forestry professionals, organizations, and others to communicate to landowners.
Please spread the word- folks can subscribe on the SFN website: Southern Sustainable Forests
Please send any contributions for the newsletter to alyx@SouthernSustainableForests.org

News notes are courtesy of Southern Forests Network News Notes
www.southernsustainableforests.org

Sustainable Forestry in the Balance

Sunday, October 29th, 2006 - posted by Appalachian Voices

In the United States we increasingly restrict wood production in the name of sustainability while going abroad for an ever larger share of the wood we consume, even though our own forest resources per capita are greater than the rest of the Earth. The unintended consequence is we transfer impacts of harvesting and consumption elsewhere. If we believe impacts of harvesting and consumption are primarily positive, we should embrace them locally. If we believe impacts are negative, we should take responsibility for them locally and mitigate them. … contemporary notions of sustainability do not discourage us from creating “sustainable” forests at home by simply going elsewhere to get the wood and products that improve our lives, and, of course, they should. Currently, there is no social or economic penalty associated with overconsumption or underproduction of forest products as long as we can export our environmental issues to other nations that feed our demand for wood.

News notes are courtesy of Southern Forests Network News Notes
www.southernsustainableforests.org

Global warming on the forest floor

Saturday, October 28th, 2006 - posted by Appalachian Voices

[ Kentucky ] Along with rising temperatures, global warming is very likely to cause a shift toward more extreme weather — stronger storms with more rainfall, and longer and more severe droughts. Those changes are likely to have large-scale, obvious effects on farmlands, grasslands and forests and on the creatures that inhabit them. But many smaller, more subtle effects are likely too. Researchers at the University of Kentucky looked at one: the impact of climate change on the decomposition of leaf litter on the forest floor. They set up forest plots and manipulated precipitation to match anticipated future levels, both wet and dry. They didn’t see much change in leaf decomposition under higher-rainfall conditions. But under drought conditions, they found, decay accelerated significantly.

News notes are courtesy of Southern Forests Network News Notes
www.southernsustainableforests.org