Follow Us on Twitter: Appalachian Voices | iLoveMountains.org

Posts Tagged ‘North Carolina’

SELC Releases Top Ten Endangered Places List, Shows Threats in Southeast

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012 - posted by jamie

The Southern Environmental Law Center recently released its fourth-annual Top 10 Endangered Places list for 2012, highlighting the ecologically and culturally rich areas throughout the Southeast that are threatened by development, water issues and the environmental impacts of mountaintop removal and hydraulic fracturing. Southeastern states bordering Appalachia, North Carolina, Virginia and Tennessee, are each featured in the list.

The Catawba-Wateree River system, originating in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina and providing drinking water for over a million people, has been negatively impacted by the presence of coal ash in leaky unlined ponds along major tributaries. In the Piedmont region, lawmakers are considering legalizing hydraulic fracturing, the controversial natural gas drilling method that has been linked to groundwater contamination and other environmental and health concerns.

In southwestern Virginia and eastern Tennessee, mountaintop removal and other destructive coal mining practices have already destroyed at least 500 mountains and damaged 1,700 miles of streams in Virginia, Tennessee and other Central Appalachian states, and pressure continues to mount. On the Virginia coast, decades of pollution in the Chesapeake Bay estuary has created dead zones incapable of supporting aquatic life.

Plans to construct and renovate highways have disrupted many distinguished recreation spots in Charlottesville, Va., and in Chilhowee Mountain, Tenn. Chilhowee Mountain is part of Tennessee’s Cherokee National Forest and known as a destination for outdoor lovers around the country.

Southern states such as South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama are experiencing severe environmental threats as well. The Savannah River, which stretches from South Carolina to Georgia, could lose many aquatic habitats as the Army Corps of Engineers plan to deepen its shipping channel.

The Dawson Forest, located just north of Atlanta, is threatened by a proposed $650 million reservoir that would drain 100 million gallons of water from the Etowah River each day to support Atlanta’s increasing water supply needs. Alabama’s coastline is on SELC’s Top Ten list for a second year because of the potential recurrence of spills like the 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion — the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

SELC is the largest environmental organization focused exclusively on the South.Their major programs cover clean energy, transportation and land use, southern forests, the coast and wetlands, and preservation of rural countryside and community character.

Activists Stage Protest, Attempt to Shut Down Operations at Coal Plant in Arden, N.C.

Monday, February 13th, 2012 - posted by jamie

Activists attached signs to the coal loader at the Progress Asheville Power Station early this morning

Please note: Community Meeting Being Held About The Dangers Of Coal This Wednesday at 6p.m. in Asheville at Posana’s Cafe. Click here to learn more.

GreenPeace is bringing the protest on coal pollution to North Carolina today (aka the #1 user of mountaintop removal mined coal), staging a protest at Duke Energy’s Lake Julian power plant in Arden, N.C.

Activists have reportedly secured themselves to the coal loader and conveyer to prevent coal from entering the facility and are planning to scale the 400-foot smoke stack to “send a message to both Progress Energy and Duke Energy that communities and the climate can’t wait for a renewable energy revolution.”

Our Red, White and Water Team is currently on the way to Asheville, so stay tuned for updates!

UPDATE 12:24 p.m.: According to an article by the Asheville Citizen-Times, as of 11:15 three climbers had reached two-thirds of the way up the 400-foot* smokestack. Sixteen activists are involved in the action, and according to a Greenpeace spokesperson some protestors have already been arrested.
(*note, 400ft number comes from Greenpeace Citizen-Times estimates the height at 300-feet)

UPDATE: Photos from Greenpeace’s action today include shots of the enormous banner hung from the 400-foot smoke stack at the Lake Julian power plant. According to an article by Mountain Xpress (which also has a great stop-action photo collage of the banner going up the smokestack), all activists have been arrested and the banner removed. See more pics on Greenpeace’s FlickR feed of the action.

In the meantime…

(more…)

SELC’s Top 10 Endangered Places List Shows Threats in the Southeast

Friday, February 10th, 2012 - posted by Madison

The Southern Environmental Law Center recently released its fourth-annual Top 10 Endangered Places list of 2012, highlighting the scenic, ecologically and culturally rich areas throughout the Southeast that are being threatened by development, water issues and the environmental impacts of mountaintop removal and hydraulic fracturing.

The Catawba-Wateree River system originates in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina traveling into South Carolina and has been negatively impacted by the presence of coal ash in leaky unlined ponds along major tributaries.

The SELC works to protect its six-state region in the Southeast. Their programs include Global Warming, Clean Energy & Air, Land & Community, Coast & Wetlands, Clean Water and Southern Forests.

But that’s not all that is threatening this network of waterways. Water withdrawal used by power plants for steam production and cooling has had severe effects on the Southeast’s water supply.

Meanwhile, on the North Carolina Piedmont, a law that bans horizontal drilling throughout the region is being attacked by the gas drilling industry and their political allies.

Virginia may be the most threatened state in the Southeast. The Appalachian Mountains in southwestern Virginia and eastern Tennessee are being destroyed by mountaintop removal. These mountains are some of the oldest on earth and more than 500 have been destroyed by mountaintop removal.

Across the state, the Chesapeake Bay estuary has been polluted for decades. What some may not know is that this pollution creates dead zones incapable of supporting aquatic life.

Plans to construct and renovate highways have disrupted many distinguished recreation spots in Charlottesville, Va., and in Chilhowee Mountain, Tenn. Chilhowee Mountain is part of Tennessee’s Cherokee National Forest and known as a destination for outdoor lovers around the country.

More southern states such as South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama are experiencing severe environmental threats as well. The Savannah River, which stretches from South Carolina to Georgia, may lose many aquatic habitats as the Army Corps of Engineers plan to deepen its shipping channel.

The Dawson Forest, located just north of Atlanta, is threatened by a proposed $650 million reservoir that would drain 100 million gallons of water from the Etowah River each day to support Atlanta’s increasing water supply needs. Alabama’s coastline is on SELC’s Top Ten list for a second year because of the potential reoccurrence of spills like the 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion — the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

The SELC has released its Top Ten list for fours years now, hoping to raise awareness among residents of these areas and others in the U.S. The environmental law organization has nearly 50 attorneys and is involved in more than 125 cases and projects in its six-state region to fight against these potentially irreversible threats.

For more information about SELC and what it does, visit: www.southernenvironment.org.

Duke Energy Raises Rates in NC

Monday, February 6th, 2012 - posted by molly

On Jan. 27, the North Carolina Utilities Commission approved a 7.2 percent rate increase for North Carolina ratepayers.

The North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper and a coalition of state public-interest groups filed legal briefs detailing their opposition to the rate hike.

The 7.2 percent increase is the result of an agreement between Duke Energy and the N.C. Utilities Commission’s Public Staff, which represents ratepayers. Duke Energy originally sought a 17 percent increase for residential customers. The Public Staff accepted comments on the matter and held hearings across the state before negotiating a lower figure with Duke Energy.

Duke Energy said the $309 million in annual revenue from the rate increase will pay for capital improvements in power plants and pollution controls. But opponents of the rate hike, such as Al Ripley, Director of the North Carolina Justice Center’s Housing and Consumer Project, said that raising utility bills in the current economic climate will increase the number people who have a hard time paying.

“We believe that in the past Duke has unfairly administrated their programs for collecting on rate payments,” Ripley said. “We’re asking the Commission to not only reject this increase but to make certain that Duke’s collection and electricity shutoff practices are fair.”

The North Carolina Justice Center filed a brief with two other state advocacy groups opposing the 7.2 percent rate hike.

“By investing in energy conservation, weatherization programs and increased efficiency you can do what’s better for the environment and what’s better for people’s financial situations,” Ripley said.

The brief filed by Attorney General Ray Cooper said that the 10.5 percent return on equity agreed upon in the current settlement is too high, and noted that the experts Duke used to justify the 10.5 percent rate of return did not consider the effect of current economic conditions on ratepayers.

Read more about the finalized rate increase here.

Check out a video of the Marion public hearing here and read about the High Point hearing here.

Delayed Coal Ash Regulations Put Public Health at Risk

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012 - posted by molly

Appalachian Voices issued the following press release to news outlets in North Carolina. A similar version was released nationally by the eleven environmental and public health groups involved in this litigation.

Delayed Coal Ash Regulations Put Public Health at Risk

Groups head to court to force issuance of important national safeguards

Washington, D.C. – Environmental and public health groups announced their intent to sue the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in federal court to force the release of long awaited public health safeguards against toxic coal ash. The EPA has delayed the first-ever federal protections for coal ash for nearly two years despite more evidence of leaking ponds, poisoned groundwater supplies and threats to public health.

“We have waited long enough for the EPA to act,” says Sandra Diaz, Appalachian Voices’ North Carolina Campaign Coordinator. “In North Carolina, we know for a fact that many coal ash ponds are contaminating groundwater, and we need the EPA to step up and provide strong guidelines to ensure public health and safety.”

This aerial photo of a coal-fired power plant in Asheville, N.C. is provided by the French Broad Riverkeeper.


Earthjustice, on behalf of Appalachian Voices (NC), Chesapeake Climate Action Network (MD), Environmental Integrity Project, French Broad Riverkeeper (NC), Kentuckians For The Commonwealth (KY), Montana Environmental Information center (MT), Physicians for Social Responsibility, Prairie Rivers Network (IL), Sierra Club and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (TN), sent the EPA a notice of intent to sue the agency under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The law requires the EPA to ensure that safeguards are regularly updated to address threats posed by wastes. However, the EPA has never undertaken any action to ensure safeguards address the known threats posed by coal ash, a toxic mix of arsenic, lead, hexavalent chromium, mercury, selenium, cadmium and other dangerous pollutants that result from burning coal at coal-fired power plants.

More than 5.5 million tons of coal ash is created each year in North Carolina, the ninth highest in the country. There are 26 active ponds in the state, 12 of which have been rated “high-hazard” by the EPA, meaning that if the ponds were to break, it would probably cause a loss of human life. The state has not moved to create state-specific standards on coal ash, though utilities have been required to do additional groundwater monitoring

“As we witness a state legislature intent on weakening the ability of state agencies like the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to do its job, we need the EPA to move forward with strong federally-enforceable guidelines that will protect communities from the dangers of coal ash,” said Pricey Harrison, a state legislator who represents Guilford County.

(more…)

The Scoop on Coal Ash at Asheville Plant in North Carolina

Thursday, December 15th, 2011 - posted by sandra

Big Thanks to Hartwell Carson, French Broad Riverkeeper for his help with this post.

Bird’s Eye View of Coal Ash

Bird's Eye View of Asheville's Coal Plant- © Copyright 2011 Roy Tennant, FreeLargePhotos.com

Coal contains heavy metals by its very nature. Heavy metals are toxic and oftentimes, a little dab will do ya. For example, just one teaspoon’s worth of mercury can contaminate a 20 acre lake to the extent that the fish become contaminated enough that they can become unsafe to eat.

When coal is burned for electricity, heavy metals are concentrated in the resultant coal ash (known more technically as “coal combustion waste”). Heavy metals of concern include but are not limited to arsenic, lead, mercury, manganese, and selenium. Each of these heavy metals can have differing negative effects on the body. (more…)

Clean Water Lovers in Wilmington, NC

Monday, November 21st, 2011 - posted by sandra

We recently took the Red, White and Water campaign to the Festival Latino in Wilmington, NC. Festival goers signed photo postcards to their member of Congress Representative Mike McIntyre asking him to stand up for our clean water protections.

Hispanic communities suffer disproportionately from the impacts of coal pollution. 32 coal-fired power plants across the country are in counties that are either more than 25% black or more than 25% Latino, and 9 are in counties that are more than 20% Native American. That means more exposure to mercury pollution from the burning of coal and arsenic pollution from coal ash dams.

So, while all Americans have a huge stake in keeping our waters clean, Latino communities are made to carry a larger pollution burden to bear.

Below are some of the great people we met in Wilmington, luchando por su derecho al agua limpia! (fighting for their right to clean water!)

Connecting Kids to Their Watersheds

Monday, November 7th, 2011 - posted by Erin

Here in Watauga County we are lucky to have relatively clean rivers and a public that is well connected with the health of the local environment. In order to support continued generations of residents who act as good stewards for the High Country and beyond, we must educate students about threats to our local environment and ensure that they feel pride and ownership of the world around them.

The Upper Watauga Riverkeeper has helped with school water-based programs at Hardin Park Middle School and Watauga High School this fall. At Hardin Park, science teacher Alan Felker invited me to speak with each of his 7th grade science classes about the many roles of a Riverkeeper. Our discussion ranged from local river cleanups to litigation against major polluters in Kentucky. I was impressed with the quality of both questions and answers I heard from many of the students. I met up with the students later in the week to assist with Mr. Felker’s aquatics lab on the New River. Students were game to get in the chilly fall water in order to measure water velocity and turbidity, and look for macroinvertebrates used as indicators of biological condition. I hope to see many of these same students for a Watauga cleanup in the spring.

On October 19th, I helped with one of several presentations focusing on marine mammals, climate change, pollution and our connection to those issues here in Watauga County. The North Carolina Museum of Natural Science and the North Carolina Fort Fisher Aquarium, through a grant from NOAA, brought in a geodome presentation that highlighted different marine mammals and threats to them resulting from global warming and plastic pollutants. Lisa Doty, the Watauga County Recycling Coordinator, and I presented a local perspective on recycling and reducing consumption in Watauga County, and the ways our efforts can impact the ocean environment.

I was pleased to find that at least one student in each group knew that plastics are made from fossil fuels, which are non-renewable resources. The students were surprised to learn that Watauga County does not have an operational landfill, so our garbage must be shipped to Lenoir. This means that not only is our waste management more costly, but it also uses more fossil fuel: an average of 8 tractor trailer loads of garbage are sent to Lenoir every day, which costs roughly $1.3 million per year. In contrast, as recycling technology has improved, the demand for recycled plastic has increased: other companies pay Watauga County for recycled plastics and recycling creates 14,000 jobs North Carolina.

We tried to impress upon students some simple every-day things they could do to help curb the influx of waste into our waterways and oceans. Two of the easiest changes that create a large and lasting impact are reducing your use of plastic water bottles and plastic grocery bags. According to the Earth Policy Institute, 1,500 plastic water bottles end up as garbage every second. Additionally, plastic grocery bags are more costly to produce from recycled material than from virgin oil. So when your Watauga High School students turn down that store-bought water in favor of a reusable container or tell you there will be no trip to the store without reusable bags, commend them for doing their part to create a healthier planet!

Duke Energy’s Tough Times, Rate Hike Hearings Continue in Marion

Thursday, October 27th, 2011 - posted by brian

On Tuesday Oct. 25, at the McDowell County courthouse in Marion, the N.C. Utilities Commission heard a succession of voices all proclaiming the same message: Do not approve the 17 percent rate hike proposed by Duke Energy Carolinas. Public hearings for feedback on the rate hike continue this week and Duke Energy’s customers are coming out, demanding to be heard. The commission is also accepting public comments by e-mail. Submit yours here.

The dozens of speakers at the Marion hearing, including local residents, retirees, environmental advocates, members of the faith community, school officials and the mayor of the city, proved further that Duke Energy’s 1.8 million customers in North Carolina come from all walks of life. And though everyone had their own reasons for opposing the rate increase, the reactions heard were unequivocal.

A Marion resident testifies before the NC Utilities Commission

Click on the photo for a video of public testimony against the proposed rate hike.

There could not be a worse time to raise rates.

If the increase is approved, Duke Energy Carolinas claims it can close unproductive plants, invest in renovations on operating facilities such as the controversial Cliffside Power Plant, and pay for several completed projects.

Dr. Richard Fireman was the first invited to speak. His calm testimony retreated from blaming Duke Energy. Instead, he shed light on the larger problems we as a society face.

“All government rights are instituted solely for the good of the whole,” Fireman said, quoting from the constitution of the state of North Carolina. “But corporate power has taken over the halls of government, which is now protecting the business of business.”

Dr. Fireman agrees, as many supporters of the Occupy Wall Street movement have claimed, that campaign finance and the enormous amount of corporate dollars spent in financing campaigns and election efforts pose a risk to the people who should be served by their elected officials.

“In 2010, 115 of the 117 members of the general assembly received over half a million dollars in donations from Duke and Progress Energy in the 2010 elections,” Fireman said. “With power like that we, the people, are desperate for a voice that has our welfare as the foundations of its activity.”

Members and staff of Appalachian Voices were present at the hearing to give testimony opposing the rate hike. North Carolina Campaign Coordinator Sandra Diaz spoke about the illusion that Duke Energy’s utmost concern is their customers.

The N.C. Utilities Commission heard from dozens of speakers opposing Duke Energy's proposed rate hike.

“Duke Energy says their core mission is to provide their customers with affordable, reliable and cleaner energy,” Diaz said. “But if Duke Energy was really concerned about ratepayers, their investment portfolio would look very different. The lack of action on energy efficiency suggests that Duke Energy’s real mission is to maximize profit for their shareholders with little regard for their ratepayers.”

“Luckily, we have the North Carolina utilities commission and the public staff.” Diaz said to those in attendance. “They’re responsible for providing fair regulation of utilities in the interest of the public, promoting least cost energy planning an providing just and reason rates and charges for utility services.”

Mayor Steve Little began his remarks by stating he was present not only to represent himself but everyone of the 8,000 residents of Marion.

“This is far, far, far too much,” Little said to the commission. He mentioned that in a part of North Carolina as economically depressed as McDowell County, people are lucky to still have their jobs.

“I don’t know of anybody who got a raise of 17.4 percent,” he said.

Others appealed to the idea that the rate hike is simply bad business. Katie Baird, a small business owner and environmentalist from Asheville, shared her thoughts with the commission.

“I understand when things are good for people, for customers, for finances and when they’re not and in my opinion Duke Energy demanding that their customers pay for failed investments is bad business,” Baird said. “I would not do that to my customers and I’m asking as a business person and as a customer that Duke Energy to do the same.”

Even after rates increases were approved on South Carolina customers last year and North Carolina customers in 2009, the company calls this a “reasonable request.” In 2010, Duke Energy walked away with record profits of $1.3 billion and its CEO, Jim Rogers earned $6.9 million in dividends.

Before public testimony began, Robin Nicholson, a Duke Energy employee in the Marion and Hickory area, spoke on behalf of her company.

“It is no secret this region has been significantly impacted by the economic downturn,” she said. But she insisted that Duke Energy, which will become the largest utilities provider in the United States if its merger with Raleigh-based Progress Energy is approved, is also facing tough times.

Somehow it just doesn’t seem the same.

Public hearings continue before a final wrap-up hearing in Raleigh on Nov. 28:
· Thursday, Oct. 27: High Point
· Wednesday, Nov 2: Durham

Visit our action page if you can’t attend but would like to submit a comment to the Utilities Commission.

You can read more coverage of the Marion hearing from The McDowell News.

Heath Shuler and Others Who Stood Up Against Dangerous Coal Ash Legislation

Friday, October 14th, 2011 - posted by sandra
Heath Shuler

Congressman Heath Shuler Stood Up for Communities Today

Today, Congressmen Heath Shuler (NC), David Price (NC), Mel Watt (NC), Brad Miller (NC), John Yarmuth (KY), Gerry Connolly (VA) and Frank Wolf (VA) voted against H.R. 2273 , the Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act, a bill that does nothing to protect our communities from the dangers of toxic coal ash.

Though we are disappointed that H.R. 2273 did achieve passage on the floor of the House today by a 267 to 144 vote, we are pleased that these members of Congress had the strength and courage to stand for communities who live near high-hazard coal ash dams, across Appalachia, the Southeast and the country.

H.R. 2273 does not provide any true safeguards against the danger of coal ash and subverts the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s public rule-making process already in progress. More than 450,000 Americans have commented on EPA proposals to address coal ash pollution and dam safety — H.R. 2273 essentially drowns out their voices. You can read more about this dangerous bill in our blog post from yesterday. (more…)