Follow Us on Twitter: Appalachian Voices | iLoveMountains.org

Posts Tagged ‘Matt Wasson’

Subcommittee Hearing A “Dog and Pony Show” With Your Ringmaster, Rep. Bill Johnson

Tuesday, March 6th, 2012 - posted by brian

Welcome to the Subcommittee Circus

I’ll admit, this morning’s Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources hearing had my head spinning. Similar to the committee’s previous hearings on the stream buffer zone rule, statements made by the Republican majority committee members could cause concerns as to who exactly they’re representing.

The hearing seemed staged to give committee members yet another opportunity to barrage Director of the Office of Surface Mining Joseph Pizarchik with criticism over the Obama administration’s proposed budget for OSM, which includes proposed changes to the Abandoned Mine Lands amendments of 2006, and the highly contested handling of a rewrite of the stream buffer zone rule, a controversial topic dating back several years. On a second panel, Appalachian Voices’ Director of Programs Dr. Matt Wasson gave testimony in support of the Administration’s rewrite of the stream buffer zone rule, using data on job creation to turn some committee members’ claims of regulations as job-killers on their head. (more…)

AV Testifies in Congress

Tuesday, March 6th, 2012 - posted by Appalachian Voices

Today, Appalachian Voices’ Director of Programs, Dr. Matt Wasson, is testifying before the Congressional Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

The hearing begins at 10 a.m. EST, and you can view the hearing homepage and watch the LIVE video feed here.

The majority of this committee has been pushing a coal-industry agenda this session, and we don’t expect this hearing to be much different. The topic is “Effect of the President’s FY 2013 Budget and Legislative Proposals for the Office of Surface Mining on Private Sector Job Creation, Domestic Energy Production, State Programs and Deficit Reduction,” and discussion will center around the Stream Protection Rule.

Matt Wasson will submit testimony as to why a strong Stream Protection Rule is necessary, and will counter industry disinformation about its effect on jobs and domestic energy protection. Rather, he will show data supporting the fact that previous oversight by the U.S. Department of Environmental Protection and the Office of Surface Mining have had no negative impact on jobs or domestic energy prices.

His testimony argues that pro-industry predictions of the impact of the Stream Protection Rule are based on faulty assumptions and non-existent data.

Stay tuned to our twitter feed (visible on our homepage) for more!