Big Trouble for Coal Plants
Big coal is in big trouble. You can see it in the statistics compiled by the Sierra Club:
Nationwide, courts or state governments have forced the cancellation or delay of 59 out of over 160 proposed new coal fired power plants, according to a Sierra Club database.
In 2006, almost 50 new power plants were proposed. None were proposed in 2007.
For example, in October of last year, a mas ive 2,000 Megawatt power plant for Kansas was rejected because of its potential carbon dioxide emissions, and similar objections to many remaining coal projects have been voiced.
In August, another 1500 megawatt Peabody power plant proposed for Muhlenberg County, Kentucky was stopped as the court said a lack of modern pollution controls would not only endanger public health, but also “effectively foreclose construction of any new sources of air pollution in the region, potentially stifling industrial growth for decades to come.”
Along with the lack of CO2 and other pollution controls, another problem is that many utilities have not disclosed any financial liabilities for the possible effects of greenhouse gas regulation in their communications with investors.
Last September, the New York Attorney General’s office subpoenaed Dominion, Peabody and three other energy companies to investigate whether their investors were informed about the potential financial risks posed by coal-burning plants which release global warming pollution emissions.
Opposition to the Wise County power plant is part of a much broader campaign against a utility industry that has tried to get new coal fired powerplants in “under the wire” of action about climate change, which seems highly probable in the next few years.
“There were a whole series of old style coal plants being developed in a rush in the Southeast,” said Cale Jaffe of the Southern Environmental Law Center. “We sent out a call to arms, and what’s amazing is how strongly people have responded.”
“We know that Congress will pass climate change legislation,” Jaffe said. “We don’t know the exact form it will take, but it is a risky time for coal fired power plants.”
Jaffee said building a new plant was like buying a new car when the dealer tells you how much it will cost in four years. “No one would operate like that, but that’s what the power companies are doing.”
Related Articles
Latest News
More Stories
English Language Learning in Appalachia
Learning English is always difficult. But current aggressive approaches to immigration policy are creating more barriers for learners and the programs that serve them than ever before in Appalachia and beyond.
Pike County Rejects Mega Landfill
Many residents of Pike County, Kentucky, are breathing a sigh of relief since county commissioners finalized their decision to rescind a contract with an out-of-state waste management company.
Overdrive: Fossil Fuels in Appalachia
Electricity demand is on the rise. Here, we share snapshots of energy trends in the region and how methane gas, coal and data centers are affecting our communities — and how people are pushing back.
Less Support for Communities with Mine Problems
The Trump administration issued a regulation to weaken the Ten Day Notice process that helps community members call in federal enforcement when state regulators don’t do a good job policing environmental problems at coal mines
Leave a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Leave a Comment