Follow Us on Twitter: Appalachian Voices | iLoveMountains.org

Posts Tagged ‘cancer’

Tuesday, April 16th, 2013 - posted by Jil

OSM Approves Expansion of Appalachia’s Largest Slurry Impoundment

The Federal Office of Surface Mining recently approved an expansion of the Brushy Fork impoundment in West Virginia — one of the largest slurry disposal sites in the country — to hold two billion more gallons of the waste produced from washing coal. Unless the West Virginia Dept. of Environmental Protection denies the expansion, the earthen dam holding back billions of gallons of coal waste will expand to nearly 750-feet tall, larger than the Hoover Dam.

Photo by Vivian Stockman

Virginia Transportation Board OKs Coalfields Expressway

In February, Virginia’s Commonwealth Transportation Board approved two sections of the Coalfields Expressway despite environmental impacts and public concerns that the route will bypass communities that could possibly benefit from the highway project. Proposed by Alpha Natural Resources, the four-lane highway project would begin as a 26-mile mountaintop removal coal mine. By proposing a public-private partnership with the Virginia Department of Transportation, Alpha Natural Resources substantially reduced VDOT’s estimated costs. The project is under review by the Federal Highway Administration, which will either give VDOT approval to move forward with construction, or require a supplemental environmental study.

More Research Links Mountaintop Removal and Poor Health

A recent study focused in eastern Kentucky is the latest in a line of research by West Virginia University’s Dr. Michael Hendryx linking mountaintop removal to poor health in nearby communities. Published in the online “Journal of Rural Health,” the article compares survey responses gathered in counties where mountaintop removal occurs to counties where it does not. After ruling out factors including tobacco use, income, education and obesity, the study found that residents of Floyd County, Ky., suffer a 54 percent higher rate of death from cancer than residents of nearby Elliott and Rowan counties. Previous studies have found that cancers and other health problems increase with the amount of mining that occurs nearby. Researchers recommend that a more comprehensive study measure air and water quality to reveal exposure to pollutants.

Greenhouse Gas Rules May Have to Wait

The announcement of the EPA’s long-awaited plan to regulate carbon emissions from existing power plants last spring brought cheers from environmental groups and added to fervorous accusations of an Obama-led “war on coal.” Now that the deadline for the rule has arrived, the agency is likely to revisit its provisions and limits. As proposed, the rule would impact new power plants and permitted plants that have not begun construction by limiting carbon emissions to 1,000 pounds per megawatt-hour of electrical output — a level unlikely to be met by coal-fired power plants. Regardless of when the rule is finalized, it is almost certain to be challenged by the coal industry and receive substantial congressional attention. The delay comes as abundant natural gas is causing coal plant retirements and making the construction of new coal-fired units uneconomical. The EPA will likely reintroduce the rule for another round of public comments.

Proposed Coal Ash Regulations Weaker than Household Waste Laws

Tuesday, December 20th, 2011 - posted by molly

Nearly three years after the Tennessee Valley Authority coal ash disaster spilled over a billion gallons of toxic sludge into the Emory River in Harriman, Tenn., the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is set to finalize guidelines regulating coal ash ponds. However, a bill in the Senate could put a permanent hold on the EPA’s ability to create federal protections on coal ash.

Currently, there are no federal laws governing coal ash disposal. If passed, Senate Bill 1751, the Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act would essentially prohibit the EPA from implementing a national standard for the management of coal ash ponds.

Coal ash is the nation’s second- largest waste stream after municipal garbage. Coal ash slurry — a by-product of burning coal for electricity — is highly toxic. According to a 2010 EPA risk assessment, people living near an unlined coal ash pond are at a 1-in-50 risk of cancer from arsenic exposure.

The same month that the coal ash bill reached the Senate, the EPA released new data showing a threefold increase in the number of “significant hazard” coal ash ponds since the 2009 inventory, which brings the total to 181. There are 47 “high hazard” coal
ash ponds. Ratings assess the damage that would likely occur should a dam containing coal ash sludge fail. “High hazard” dams would endanger human life during a dam failure.

Just this past October, a bluff at a We Energies coal plant in Wisconsin collapsed.and sent an estimated 2,300 cubic yards of ash and soil from a former coal ash landfill into Lake Michigan. The EPA has presented two coal ash regulation proposals for public hearings and comments. The agency’s Subtitle C plan would classify coal ash as a “special waste” and provide the strongest protections of the proposed plans. The agency’s other proposal, Subtitle D, would rank coal ash as “non-hazardous waste” but still allow some federal oversight of its disposal. Since the rulemaking process for coal ash began, the agency has received over 450,000 public comments requesting that coal ash be regulated as hazardous waste.

If passed, the Senate bill would block both of these proposals and leave coal ash disposal standards weaker than the federal rules that govern household waste. The bill does not require that states inspect ponds for structural stability, detect groundwater leaks, clean up or close slurry ponds that contaminate groundwater or consider public health and the environment.

Proponents of the Senate and House versions contend that any federal regulation of coal ash will impair job growth. A recent study from Tufts University shows that, even when using the coal industry’s significantly higher coal ash regulation cost estimate, implementation of the EPA’s Subtitle C proposal would create 28,000 jobs.

Congressional Hearing on Stream Buffer Zone Neglects Residents

Thursday, October 13th, 2011 - posted by brian

By Jamie Goodman

On Sept. 26, a Congressional hearing took place in Charleston, W.Va. to discuss proposed revisions to the controversial stream buffer zone rule designed to further protect waterways in Appalachia.

Conducted by Representatives Doug Lamborn (R-CO) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) from the Subcommitte on Energy and Mineral Resources in Charleston, W.Va., the hearing featured testimony from eight panelists with ties to the coal industry on the economic impacts of a buffer zone rule change. Only two panelists were invited to stand up for human health and communities affected by surface mining.

The original rule — created by the Office of Surface Mining in 1983 to outlaw the dumping of mining waste within 100 feet of streams — was changed during the Bush administration to lift restrictions and make dumping easier for mining operations.

But at the hearing, dubbed “Jobs at Risk: Community Impacts of the Obama Administration’s Effort to Rewrite the Stream Buffer Zone Rule,” the mostly pro-coal committee and panel made the case that the proposed revisions constitute a direct attack on the coal industry and mining jobs.

A press release circulated by the Committee about the hearing failed to include mention of Webb’s testimony or their appearance on the panel.

Central Appalachian Coal: In Short Supply and Hard to Get To

By J.W. Randolph

Last year, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) reported that around 44 percent of United States coal production came from one place — the Powder River Basin (PRB). Spread underneath Wyoming and Montana, PRB coal has significantly increased its share of our national coal production in the last decade. The expansion of western coal has coincided with a steep decline in the production of coal in the region known as Central Appalachia, an area that includes southern West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee.

According to MSHA, Central Appalachian coal (CAPP) production is down 20 percent since 2008, and the federal Energy Information Administration expects another 50 percent drop in production by 2015.

The decline in CAPP production is partially due to the increasing competitiveness of western coal and natural gas. But many experts in the region attribute the drop to the simple fact that Appalachia has been mining coal for more than a century, and that many of the resources are economically unfeasible to recover.

Bill Raney, a prominent coal backer, and the president of the West Virginia Coal Association, recently addressed the forecast, saying “What’s happening is that the easier, thicker, cleaner, higher-recovery seams were mined over the years, and what we’re dealing with now is coal that has to be prepared to a greater extent than it used to … The recovery percentages are down.”

CAPP production is expected to continue falling — and prices per ton rising — as the cost of mining increases and coal seams become thinner and harder to access.

Study Links Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining and Cancer

The associate director of the University of West Virginia’s Institute for Health Policy Research, Dr. Michael Hendryx has documented a direct link between the practice of mountaintop removal coal mining and 60,000 cases of cancer among a population of 1.2 million people living in areas of Central Appalachia where the mining occurs. The study, “Relations Between Health Indicators and Residential Proximity to Coal Mining in West Virginia,” published in the peer-reviewed American Journal of Public Health, noted the connection even after accounting for instances of cancer resulting from age, gender, smoking, on-the-job exposure and family cancer history. Residents living in the region where the mining is practiced are twice as likely to develop cancer than community members living in the region in areas without surface mining.

Breaking: New Study Links Mountaintop Removal to 60,000 Additional Cancer Cases

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011 - posted by jeff

by Jeff Biggers, cross posted from Alternet.org
Among the 1.2 million American citizens living in mountaintop removal mining counties in central Appalachia, an additional 60,000 cases of cancer are directly linked to the federally sanctioned strip-mining practice.

That is the damning conclusion in a breakthrough study, released last night in the peer-reviewed Journal of Community Health: The Publication for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Led by West Virginia University researcher Dr. Michael Hendryx, among others, the study entitled “Self-Reported Cancer Rates in Two Rural Areas of West Virginia with and Without Mountaintop Coal Mining” drew from a groundbreaking community-based participatory research survey conducted in Boone County, West Virginia in the spring of 2011, which gathered person-level health data from communities directly impacted by mountaintop mining, and compared to communities without mining.

“A door to door survey of 769 adults found that the cancer rate was twice as high in a community exposed to mountaintop removal mining compared to a non-mining control community,” said Hendryx, Associate Professor at the Department of Community Medicine and Director of West Virginia Rural Health Research Center at West Virginia University. “This significantly higher risk was found after control for age, sex, smoking, occupational exposure and family cancer history. The study adds to the growing evidence that mountaintop mining environments are harmful to human health.”

Bottom line: Far from simply being an environmental issue, mountaintop removal is killing American residents.

Read the entire article on Alternet.org