Follow Us on Twitter: Appalachian Voices | iLoveMountains.org

Archive for the ‘Editorial’ Category

A Call for Climate Security

Wednesday, December 5th, 2012 - posted by meghan

"Sandy" cartoonIn America, our view of the wider world is often colored by concerns about security. But today, international security is about more than tariffs and terrorism — it’s about protecting access to clean water and the productivity of the farms that feed the world.

Sea level rise might be a punchline for certain political audiences, but to the Pentagon, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and nations around the world, an unstable climate is no idle threat.

“The world is barreling down a path to heat up by 4 degrees [Celsius] at the end of the century if the global community fails to act on climate change, triggering a cascade of cataclysmic changes that include extreme heat-waves, declining global food stocks and a sea-level rise affecting hundreds of millions of people,” the World Bank cautioned in a November report.

Climate change will likely hit developing countries hardest but its effects don’t respect international borders. We’re directly affected by increasingly violent storms and droughts, but those are just the most apparent effects of global temperature increases.

When 11 retired generals and admirals were convened by a nonprofit research organization to assess the situation, their report warned, “Climate change can act as a threat multiplier for instability in some of the most volatile regions of the world, and it presents significant national security challenges for the United States.”

To create a truly secure world, we need sound energy policies that foster a stable climate.

Talk of energy security inevitably raises cries of “Drill, baby, drill!” But establishing American energy independence on the back of fossil fuels means pushing the world further toward climate chaos and spawning humanitarian and ecological crises with a web of impacts more difficult to predict or understand than a flooded New York subway system or the demise of Appalachia’s salamanders.

Any energy policy that threatens global access to food and water, that pushes island nations underwater or leads to the destruction of a region’s natural heritage will not lead to a secure future. If we let our elected leaders get away with threatening world stability in the name of false energy “security” that benefits a few in the short term and none in the long term, we will have failed our children and the planet.

Instead, we need to realize our potential by building an energy system that prioritizes efficiency and renewable sources of power, and we need to do it now.

Across Appalachia and around the world, communities are coming together to support smart growth and sustainable practices and make the clean energy future a reality. The climate crisis is global, but the solution begins at home.

Seeking A Return to Truth

Friday, October 19th, 2012 - posted by molly

When did America’s leaders stop trusting in science?

This fair country, with its wealth of knowledge and opportunity, used to be one of the global frontrunners in scientific reasoning, influence and education. We stood by the principles of proof rather than blind emotion or myth. In the 19th century, those principles brought us anesthesia and refrigeration, and in the 20th century they launched us to the moon and made us a leader in medicine, computer technology. In fact, since 1950, Americans have won approximately half of the Nobel Prizes awarded in the sciences.

So tell me, when did we abandon reason for madness?

In some circles in modern America, to admit that climate change exists is to admit that what many of our corporate interests have done in pursuit of profit is not only selfish, but immoral, unjust and in some cases amounts to negligent homicide.

We have never been more equipped, technologically or cognitively, to address the greatest challenges of our time. And climate change is unequivocally one of them. Yet, instead of taking sound science into account, much less accept and act on it, many continue to choose denial.

The twisting of scientific facts — and climate science in particular — is a smokescreen that hides the guilt and fattened purses of those who are desecrating our planet, poisoning people and polluting the future of our children in exchange for quarterly earnings.

According to a yearly study by Yale University, following the severe drought and bizarre weather of the past two years, a whopping 66 percent of Americans believe in climate change, while a report by the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication revealed that 72 percent believe that developing clean energies should be a national priority. Even following the cold winters of 2009 and 2010, more than half of Americans still believed climate change was a real threat — despite studies that show colder winters skew the results even if summers are warmer.

But thanks to a powerful propaganda machine, unscrupulous media outlets that act as little more than echo chambers, and embedded industry lobbyists on Capitol Hill, the nation’s politicians are falling in line not with honest and verifiable scientific facts, and not with the American people they purport to represent, but with the corporations that line their pockets.

Our most admired Founding Fathers — including John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin — adhered to the tenets of scientific study. It’s time that the American people demand that our politicians embrace a mindset where sensibility and reason prevail and scientific fact is accepted as just that — fact.

So tell me, when will we return from madness to reason?

What’s Our Water Really Worth?

Wednesday, August 8th, 2012 - posted by brian

As our most precious natural resource, clean drinking water, all-too-quickly becomes a scarce commodity for global communities, it is also turning into a hot commodity for multinational corporations.

According to a United Nations Global Environment Outlook study, two-thirds of the world’s population is expected to face water shortages by 2025. And to assess and prepare for those shortages, some of the world’s wealthiest corporations have created a series of maps that inventory the world’s groundwater aquifers.

Monoliths of the global economy such as Goldman Sachs, Dow Chemical Company, Bloomberg, GE and Coca-Cola have teamed up under the moniker Aqueduct Alliance to detail hydrological data on the world’s largest river basins, giving investors unprecedented details of international water availability.

It appears that the insatiable ilk of Big Business is deciding how to divvy up our water.

Privatization of water resources — or leasing public utilities to private corporations — is well-known in many parts of the world, but is only now becoming more common in the United States. In some developing nations, privatizing water utilities has helped build much-needed infrastructure in communities previously lacking access to fresh, clean water. But in several cases, privatization has also resulted in higher rates and poorer water quality — in one instance resulting in the worst cholera outbreak in South African history.

Today, nearly 70 million Americans get their tap water by way of private companies who have struck lease agreements with public municipalities. According to consumer rights group Food and Water Watch, those residents pay an average of 33 percent more for their water than residents on public water sources.

With many of the nation’s urban areas facing funding shortfalls, the lure of handing off water supply projects to private companies with deeper pockets can be irresistible. But the results are not always positive. In one example cited in The Daily Beast, United Water, an American subsidiary of the multinational corporation Suez, shut down sewage pumps in the city of Milwaukee in order to save money — and dumped billions of gallons of raw sewage into Lake Michigan. The city of Gary, Ind., cancelled a 12-year contract with the same company, claiming their dealings with United Water had more than doubled annual operating costs.

Individual citizens and the environment are typically the biggest losers when profits are on the line. With quarterly gains for shareholders as their primary concern, private companies have no incentive to encourage water conservation or water-quality protection, and dwindling reservoir supplies and increasing population demands will ultimately drive up prices.

In other words, selling a fundamental resource that people literally cannot live without is good for big business. And now we have proof that corporations are thirstily eyeing the world’s reservoirs with dollar signs swimming in their eyes.

As National Geographic famously published in 1993, “All the water that will ever be is, right now.” This is all we get. We must ensure that our water remains a publicly owned resource for all to use efficiently, without a price tag determined by the highest bidder. Because water is, and always should be, priceless.

Saving Our Natural Heritage

Monday, June 11th, 2012 - posted by meghan

The American spirit is tied to the land, to “purple mountain majesties” and the pioneer’s self-reliance. Our relationship with the natural world has always been a balancing act between the drives of conquest and extraction and an instinctual dependence, curiosity and respect.

When we fail to guard our public lands against those who would tilt that balance into the deep pockets of a greedy few, we are selling out the American spirit. Supporters of big industry try to decry the very presence of public land, implying that the word “public” violates our freedom. That couldn’t be further from the truth — the public is us, and this is our land.

The American Legislative Exchange Council — the ultra-conservative lobby group that championed mandatory IDs for voters and launched preemptive attacks on regulation of coal ash — has set its sights on reducing protections for public lands. ALEC is behind proposals that would benefit extractive industry by transferring ownership of federal wilderness areas to states, undermine the president’s ability under the century-old Antiquities Act to establish national monuments, and roll back the Endangered Species Act.

A slew of bills would impose costly penalties for groups or individuals that challenge leasing and drilling decisions on public lands. Extractive industries claim their access to public land is unfairly restricted, even though they have more public land than they need — over 20 million acres of federal land leased by these industries are unused.

Legislation was also introduced this spring, ironically called the Sportsman’s Heritage Act, that claims to open wilderness for hunters and anglers, but would actually lead to the intrusion of more roads and logging in wild areas that are already open to hunting. Opponents to the bill see it as a petty attempt to divide hunters and conservationists and prevent them from standing up for their shared resources.

Yet if there’s one thing Americans agree on, it’s the protection of our public lands, even if some of our elected officials don’t understand the land’s value.

Undeveloped public lands help to clean our air and water, and provide economic boons to municipalities across the country via recreation and tourism. Americans have a public covenant to protect our remaining wild places for future generations.
Championing the short-term wishes of corporate power brokers over long-term needs to protect our health and local communities means that profit wins out over humanity.

It’s up to us to determine whether this is the moment in history where our natural heritage is sold to the highest bidder or where the voices of the people unite to protect our public lands.

Too Big to Fail, But Not to Change

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012 - posted by Madison

When “pink slime” hit the headlines in March, Americans were rightfully disgusted. The thought of being poisoned for profit by beef-product filler treated with ammonia sparked national outrage. Grocery stores and even mega-fast food restaurants such as McDonald’s and Taco Bell were quick to publicly shun the slimy substance. Over the course of just a few days, and a lot of bad publicity pointed at the beef industry, business practices radically changed.

However, there are even more toxic industries that are continuing business as usual. The fossil fuel interests and the financial institutions that help fund them don’t need our consent to poison our bodies and contribute to the growing curse of climate change. They don’t respond to scrutiny the way Taco Bell might either. They don’t need to — they’re the most profitable entities on Earth.

Names like J.P. Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America might not have the negative connotations that Massey Energy or Exxon Mobil bring to mind, but in some ways they’re one and the same. Without these financial institutions mobilizing capital funding for electric utilities and fossil fuel companies, multi-billion dollar power plants would never be built.

The “too big to fail” institutions operate under the guise of corporate responsibility. J.P. Morgan Chase, the largest investor in coal-fired electricity, claims on its website that they are “Helping the world transition to a low-carbon economy.” Bank of America, the third-largest investor, hypocritically acknowledges that “The most formidable challenge we face is global climate change.”

Both the financial and fossil fuel industries continue to victimize Americans. One fraudulently forecloses on families and even got off scot-free after creating a global financial crisis in a futile attempt to satisfy its insatiable greed. The other enjoys unnecessary subsidies in times of record profit while polluting the air and water. These corporations and their political allies support cuts to essential social programs but complain that closing tax loopholes is “socialism” and “un-American.”

The bottom line is that, while the financial and energy sectors are essential to a functioning economy, they’ve irresponsibly wielded the power we’ve given them by believing that we work for them, not the other way around.

Whether it’s “pink slime,” the financial crash of 2008, the BP oil spill of 2010 or the ongoing destruction of Appalachia by mountaintop removal, millions are voicing their disgust at the lack of corporate responsibility, accountability and foresight. Yet somehow, in a severe case of cognitive dissonance, energy giants and the monoliths of Wall Street think that less government oversight and “self-regulation” is the solution.

In our society’s hunger for endless economic growth, we’re beginning to forget who we really work for — future generations and their inalienable right to every opportunity afforded to us.

Lieutenant Governor Ron Ramsey recently helped kill a bipartisan bill in the Tennessee state senate that would have banned mountaintop removal coal mining in the state. Ramsey recieved more than $195,000 in contributions from coal interests during his 2010 campaigns.

Time to Stop the Denial

Tuesday, December 20th, 2011 - posted by molly

Let’s talk about losing touch. According to a 2011 study by the Pew Research Center, fewer Americans believe in global warming than did five years ago. Politicians treat climate change as a non-issue and wage war on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as if Americans asked for it. In reality, the opposites are resolutely true. Surveys by the Public Policy Polling show that Americans want the environment protected and peer-reviewed studies confirm that we cannot afford to wait any longer to accept and proactively deal with climate change. After all, these are not political issues to be used; they are issues of conscience.

Upon completing the two-year Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature study, American physicist Richard Muller, a long-time climate skeptic, changed his position. “Global warming is real,” he declared in the Wall Street Journal, citing findings that global temperatures have risen around 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit over the past 50 years.

It’s unlikely these are the results that the right-wing Charles Koch Foundation (one of the study’s funders) had expected or hoped for. The foundation released a statement reminding that, amidst the media frenzy, the Berkeley study is under peer review. But Koch is a climate change denier, not a skeptic, an important distinction as one changes their views to fit the evidence — the other ignores it.

At a Nov. 14 congressional hearing organized by the ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Muller briefed policymakers on the results of the study. There is no way to know, however, if Muller’s recommendations will result in any positive change.

Meanwhile, the EPA continues to fight off attacks by politicians clinging to the unsupported argument that environmental regulations kill jobs. Surveys by Public Policy Polling show that attacks on the agency’s ability to protect the air and water won’t get politicians far with the majority of American voters. Among the results: 78 percent of voters want the EPA to hold polluters accountable for their toxic emissions.

It’s time to stop denying and start listening. How many more so-called studies funded by pro-industry climate change deniers will yield the same results, while they continue to ignore the fact that 95 percent of the scientific community accepts climate change?

In 2010, we saw the largest increase in carbon dioxide pumped into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution began — 564 million more tons than in 2009, an increase of six percent. The approval rating of Congress is hovering around nine percent, the lowest ever. I would not go so far as to claim that these numbers are correlated, but I’m not going to deny it.

Where is our National Media? — Editorial

Thursday, October 13th, 2011 - posted by brian

I know rants about this particular point have appeared widespread in independent publications, but The Appalachian Voice has avoided weighing in. Now it’s time to go there.

IS mainstream media on vacation?

The most well-known story of late conspicuous in its absence from big news conglomerates is certainly the weeks-long Occupy Wall Street protest still growing in New York City as we go to press.

The action was in its second week before major outlets ran the story, and reports primarily focused on the hundreds of arrests with almost no mention of apparent violence taking place between police and primarily non-violent protesters.

This overt omission of news that casts corporate America in any sort of bad light is, sadly, more and more common.

By-and-large, mainstream media appears to be dropping the ball — but a few reporters are still on the job.

Take the powerful article by Associated Press news reporter Dylan Lovan, published during the last week of September with the simple yet telling headline, “Appalachia Faces Steep Coal Decline.”

In the article, Lovan addresses the rapid decline of readily mineable Appalachian coal and cites a Department of Energy statistic that forecasts central Appalachian coal production will “drop to 112 million tons by 2015, less than half of the 234 million tons mined three years ago.” He also mentions how the second largest coal producer in the nation, Arch Coal, informed investors last year that central Appalachian coal “is in secular decline — faced with depleting reserves and significant regulatory hurdles.”

While not news to scientists and advocates working on coal issues in Appalachia, this fact essentially means that the 37,000-plus coal miners in Appalachia, as well as the tens of thousands of ancillary jobs that accompany coal mining, are at risk — not from EPA regulations, as some have attempted to claim, but from a lack of coal.

So why is the American public still buying into the line that the Obama Administration regulations on coal mining are job killers?

According to Google’s aggregate news tool, 22 news sources carried Lovan’s AP story, but only three — The Washington Post, CBSNews, and BusinessWeek — could be considered top-source media agencies. And of course there is no way of knowing how far into their websites the story was buried or if the headlines even made it to the main page.

With talk of the economy at the forefront of media conversation, how can the potential loss of tens of thousands of jobs over the next ten years in one of the poorest regions of the country NOT be front page news?

In order to make informed decisions about the future, the American public depends on the media. Omissions and partial truths controlled by industry interests will only lead to bad decisions, leaving the fate of our democracy in uncertain hands.

It’s high time our mainstream news got back to work.

Editorial and Viewpoint

Monday, August 1st, 2011 - posted by meghan

A Politician A Day Keeps The EPA At Bay

What is it about politicians that calls them to be so obedient to the worst of the bad apples in big business? The mantra of the 112th Congress seems to be that we should use the pain of an economic recession to justify more unsustainable and dirty practices that harm the environment, public safety and human health.

Bills that threaten to undermine every shred of human protection won by generations of Americans are now crowding the floor of the U.S. House, threatening our air, water and well-being. A focus on good jobs and sustainable economic growth, however, seems to be entirely off the table.

Bills like H.R. 2018, which would remove federal oversight on water regulations and hand them to the states (despite a new GAO report showing how badly states fail at water quality oversight); H.R. 2273, which would prohibit the regulation of toxic coal ash as a hazardous material; and H.R. 2401, which would delay public health protections against deadly emissions from coal-fired power plants.

Surely, Congressional representatives must understand that their constituents, friends and families will be breathing the same toxic air and drinking the same poisoned water as the rest of us. But many politicians have become so overwhelmed with the allure of large campaign contributions and slick-tongued lobbyists that the “public good” becomes mere background noise in their ongoing quest to please the status quo rather than actually represent “the people” they are here to govern.

According to Greenpeace, House Majority leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) has received an astounding $655,547 since the 2000 election season from fossil fuel industry heavyweights like Dominion Electric. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann (R-MN) has taken $131,980 in campaign financing from fossil fuel companies since 2006.

Both Bachmann and Cantor’s home districts have power plants without the readily available mercury controls that would lessen the pollution spewed into the air—pollution that is poisoning their own communities, families and even, shockingly enough, themselves.

Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers’ (R-KY) eastern Kentucky district is home to the most mountaintop removal in the nation—as well asthe lowest life expectancy, the worst physical health and some of the highest poverty rates of any district in the country.

It would seem that the conservative Congress is dead set on trading the “heavy-handed oversight” they claim to loathe for a corporate boss who tells them exactly what to do and how to vote. It’s like comparing apples to, well, apples. And in the case of politicians who would trade our clean air and clean water for anything—let alone a campaign contribution—well, those are some very bad apples indeed.

On Hunting

By T.R. Kirkpatrick
I sat in my stand where I had sat through many a Christmas day and watched the deer grazing the grass of the orchard by the apple trees, and I remembered the anniversary of my first hunt, when I had walked silently into the receding light of a cold winter’s dusk, through the bare and slate-gray woods of my predecessors, my father’s rifle with me for my rite of passage, when a boy becomes a provider, bringing me into communion with the wilderness, and entering me into a circle that I could not become a part of otherwise.

That day I had passed along the road through the maple grove between the orchard and hay field in silence, listening to the soft wind of winter pass among the bare canopy above me and the steady live beat of my own heart within.

I did not see the buck in the field through the brush and trees, but instead felt it as it looked up towards my direction from where it grazed. The buck turned to face me, stamping its hoof and grunting from its flared nostrils, but I remained patient and the buck bowed to graze then raised its head again, looking through the bare limbs and dead leaves.

The time passed slowly and as the shadows were growing longer I stood facing the deer in still silence, and slowly the buck went to graze along the top of the pasture, turning its side to me as it walked into the clearing. I dropped to my knee, shouldered the rifle, and took the deer into my sights.

I witnessed death by my own hand for the first time, kneeling beside it and running my hand over the wild animal, feeling its death as the body ceased to quiver. In a fleeting wisp, the soul was gone. The body released the spirit in a final sigh, no longer a deer, but only a corpse, and I was now a provider. I fell back beside my brother and mourned the blood between us.

From that time on I have fed my family on the deer that have come through those pastures, and with the deer I have shared the communion of their passing in a place where age is seldom the cause of death. So I love them more than the others in the woods, for I know them in sacred ceremony. I have been the caretaker of their fields and so they have cared for us in their sacrifice, and so on that Christmas morning, as all those past, I went into the woods without my rifle, and sat silently as they grazed before me.

Reid Kirkpatrick is a writer and carpenter currently living in Williamsburg, Va. Reid and his wife are currently planning a move to New Zealand for a year, where his wife will teach. While there, Reid hopes to work on a novel and find a position on a sustainable farm.

Appalachia’s Christmas Future

Monday, December 6th, 2010 - posted by jillian

If Charles Dickens were alive today spinning Christmas yarns, he would be writing about the health and well-being of Appalachia. He wouldn’t write about how industries “keep the lights on.” He’d worry about the grim conditions that keep the hospitals full and the environment foul.

As Dickens heard demands for cuts in environmental and safety regulations—as well as health care access for working Americans—his attention would turn to the calls of struggling families seeking hope and a new era.
Dickens might not be tempted to wax rhapsodic about the ingenuity of American industry. Instead, he would expound on the frailty of human nature in the face of overwhelming greed.

In A Christmas Carol for our time, Scrooge would be a wholly-owned self-interested corporation focused exclusively on the bottom line.

And of course, he would be visited by the three Christmas ghosts.

Appalachian Christmas Past would take Scrooge on a tour of the public health, labor and environmental justice movements. He’d see the moments when people fought for their rights, but lost to the financial power of small super-affluent special interests.

Appalachian Christmas Present would float Scrooge through the grotesquely dismal insurance claims process for black lung disease and cancer…and the many insults and treatment denials the current health care system hurls at the dying.

Appalachian Christmas Future would bring Scrooge to an isolated graveyard, surrounded by sterile rocky fields where toxic streams flow down to a dead and oily sea.

But how does the redemption that Dickens writes into the Victorian-era tale come to Appalachia?

Picture our Scrooge, flinging open the window Christmas morning, realizing that its not too late. Imagine the now-reformed-geezer rallying bipartisan support for environmental protection and humane health-care policies. Imagine his campaigns to put new life into local businesses like home weatherization, renewable energy and farmers markets.

Most of all, imagine Scrooge on his knees, praying for forgiveness, remembering what Marley told him: “Mankind was my business. The common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and benevolence, were, all, my business.”

As the joy of the moment fills us with blessings for each and every one of us, let’s take the pen from Dickens and help draft the happy ending—and new beginning—for our Treasured Appalachia.

Season’s Greetings, Appalachia—here’s a toast to a New Year working together for a healthier future.

Acknowledging A Time For Transition

Monday, September 6th, 2010 - posted by Anna

A friend of mine has a son who is serving in Afghanistan. His home is in the mountains of Boone, North Carolina, where tourism and a sizable state-run university dictate a relatively stable economy and jobs to be had once he—God willing—returns.

But there are many such sons and daughters with homes in coalfield regions of West Virginia, Virginia and Kentucky who will not be as fortunate in their post-tour-of-duty lives. Available jobs are at an all-time low in these regions, known to be among the poorest in the country. The coal industry blames federal regulations on mountaintop removal coal mining for the decline in jobs.

According to the bureau of labor statistics, however, the 1950s saw 120,000 direct coal miners in the state of West Virginia alone while in 2008 there were around 20,000. Most of these job losses stemmed from the switch from underground to surface and mountaintop removal mining, which requires fewer workers and maximizes company profits.

Coal companies have also increasingly rejected unionization, resulting in fewer worker benefits, lower pay, and increasingly unsafe working conditions. Again, all in the name of profit.

The poverty rate in Appalachia hovers near a staggering 24%, drug usage is at an all time high and an economic future dependent on coal seams beyond peak production looks grim.

If elected officials in West Virginia, Kentucky and Virginia do not cease backdoor deals and intimate relations with the fossil fuels industry and begin to conceive of more realistic—and 21st Century—alternatives, a regional depression of epic proportions seems imminent.

Those who can afford to will migrate to other states, though lack of education or training in industries other than coal mining may relegate many to low-paying jobs with little opportunity for advancement.

Those without the means to move will be left to scramble for odd jobs and remnants of coal-related jobs, while the poorest slip deeper into poverty, some living in houses resembling little more than shacks and suffering from poor health and malnourishment.

Is this what the fossil fuels industry calls the American dream?

Environmental groups have talked for years about ‘now’ being the time to create the foundation of a new economic plan for Appalachia. In truth, Yesterday was the time for laying the foundation. By today we should be implementing said plan, so that we might in days to come reap the rewards with a renewed, vibrant regional pride. Instead, residents of the coalfields are economic prisoners of a system constructed with 19th century ideals and fueled by the pursuit of profit.

We are out of time.